I agree with David. There is no need to cram everything into server/trunk. Samples are now hooked up with the automatic Geronimo builds so I think that should be enough (as long as people will actaully pay attention if they fail to build ok).
Jarek On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:16 AM, David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mar 12, 2008, at 7:12 AM, Joe Bohn wrote: > > > Donald Woods wrote: > >> Joe Bohn wrote: > >>> > >>> 2) When to release the samples? I think we should make an effort > >>> to release the samples concurrent with each Geronimo release. > >>> This is important because the jsp & servlet examples are > >>> referenced from within the welcome page on Geronimo. I suppose > >>> we could remove that reference and eliminate the need to release > >>> concurrently. > >> why not move the samples back under geronimo/server, so they are > >> maintained and versioned with each release and can then be used as > >> additional testsuite tests? If not, releasing right after a > >> server release is fine. > > > > I was thinking about doing this. It seems everybody thinks we > > should release them together anyway so what is the real value with > > them being split out? Does anybody object to moving them back with > > the server? > > well, since I thought our next goal with the server build was to > separate it into independently released plugins, I think putting the > samples in with the main server build would be a big step backwards. > > thanks > david jencks > > > > > Joe > > > > > >
