Just as Dan said, I think a lightweight process would be a good idea. Not to deter users from contributing, nor hinder those approving. If we haven't had a problem with the Jira check-box format for IP reasons, this seems like not only a lightweight process but a familiar one at that.
-Joseph Leong On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 8:37 AM, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Apr 16, 2008, at 7:34 PM, Gianny Damour wrote: > > I am supportive of Erik's suggestion. I am absolutely against a process > > involving the submission of an iCLA. > > > > Is a checkbox really required? Isn't a disclaimer enough to protect IP > > rights? > > > > Well, I think we can assume that a checkbox was a requirement for > Jira-based submissions (a disclaimer was not sufficient). Since, Wiki > submissions are essentially the same, I don't think a simple disclaimer will > be sufficient... > > --kevan > >
