On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Lin Sun <linsun....@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > I am checking at our web profile assemblies to ensure it met the > requirements for Java EE 6 web profile and prune the unnecessary > artifacts. I've been mainly look at the tomcat7-javaee6-web and I > have some comments/questions: > > felix core: i assume we'll always ship 2 osgi runtime?
Yep, that's the plan. > connector (geronimo-connector, geronimo-connector-builder, connector > spec): I think openejb uses connector, so we may have to keep it in. > > java ee management 1.1: Unchanged from Java EE 5. I assume this is > provided by geronimo-management. Not sure if we could remove this? > > java ee deployment 1.2 related: Unchanged from Java EE 5. we may > have to keep it in, to keep existing deployment work. > > geronimo-javamail: can we get rid of it? think the answer is yes. Maybe. Might be nicer to include it. > geronimo-jaspi: can we get rid of it? think the answer is yes. Maybe. Might be nicer to include it. > geronimo-webservices, geronimo-webservices-builder: think we could > remove these. Yes, i think so. > geronimo-yoko, yoko: think we could remove these. > > spec jars: we seems to include all specs in web profile assembly. > things that can be removed: aspic, jaxr, jaxrpc, jaxws, dims, saaj, > ccpp? I don't think this is very important. A lot of specs have dependencies on each other. So this might be a mess to sort it all out. I think we should be able to include them all even though we don't provide all of that functionality. At runtime an user should see an error that a given provider is not found. > > mina: think we could remove it... not sure which web profile function > it related to. It's not related to web profile. It used so one can remotely login to Karaf/Geronimo shell. So this should be totally ok. > ops4j, pax-loggin-api, pax-url-mvn, pax-url-wrap: think these are just > test dependencies that were put into the assembly incorrectly. Again, not related to web profile. And these are used at runtime. We need them. Expect maybe pax-url-wrap. > tranql: think we could remove it. > > openejb: anything we could do so that we can just have the ejb-lite function? > > pluto/portal: I assume these are needed for admin console so we need it. Right. Shouldn't matter for web profile. Jarek
