Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patch ??

[Jeff Trawick]

Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> At 11:00 AM -0400 8/28/01, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> >
> >HAVE_NONE_xxx means that you can turn the accept mutex into a no-op,
> >even in the multiple-listener case.  If we can play around with this
> >on one platform (e.g., Darwin), why can't we play around with this
> >everywhere?
> 
> Because, at least with the systems I've been testing, it appears to
> work OK on OS X, and, as such, we should allow others to have the
> choice. I've no idea if it works under IRIX, and having it as
> a compiled default implies that we've tested it as such... Basically,
> I want people to be able to use any of the compiled-in methods and
> have Apache work (maybe not the fastest, but at least we know it
> works). If we find out that NONE is supported and viable on
> other platforms, we'll change things to make it a compiled default,
> but it's premature to do it *now* without that knowledge.

how would it not work?  fubar kernel?

-- 
Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP public key at web site:
       http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/
             Born in Roswell... married an alien...