Marc Slemko wrote: > > So I don't see how "NONE" is viable on _ANY_ platform in the multiple > listener case. It may seem to "mostly" work, but it is not reliable and > can not be permitted. > threaded -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither"
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patch ?? Jeff Trawick
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patch ?? Jim Jagielski
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patch ?? Jeff Trawick
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patc... Jim Jagielski
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patch ?? Ryan Bloom
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patch ?? Jeff Trawick
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patc... Jim Jagielski
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patch ?? Jim Jagielski
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patch ?? Jeff Trawick
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patch ?? Marc Slemko
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patch ?? Jim Jagielski
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patch ?? Jim Jagielski
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patc... Dirk-Willem van Gulik
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patch ?? Marc Slemko
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patc... Dirk-Willem van Gulik
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patch ?? Marc Slemko
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patc... Dirk-Willem van Gulik
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patch ?? Jim Jagielski
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patc... Dirk-Willem van Gulik
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patch ?? Marc Slemko
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patch ?? Bill Stoddard