Jeff Trawick wrote: > > how would it not work? fubar kernel? > The trick would be in it *working*... NONE implies no mutexing at all, even for multiple listeners. And *that's* the exception. -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither"
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patch ?? Jim Jagielski
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patch ?? Jeff Trawick
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patc... Jim Jagielski
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patch ?? Ryan Bloom
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patch ?? Jeff Trawick
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patc... Jim Jagielski
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patch ?? Jim Jagielski
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patch ?? Jeff Trawick
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patch ?? Marc Slemko
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patch ?? Jim Jagielski
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patch ?? Jim Jagielski
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patc... Dirk-Willem van Gulik
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patch ?? Marc Slemko
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patc... Dirk-Willem van Gulik
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patch ?? Marc Slemko
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patc... Dirk-Willem van Gulik
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patch ?? Jim Jagielski
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patc... Dirk-Willem van Gulik
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patch ?? Marc Slemko
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patch ?? Bill Stoddard