On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Marc Slemko wrote: > On Wed, 29 Aug 2001, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > Marc Slemko wrote: > > > > > > So I don't see how "NONE" is viable on _ANY_ platform in the multiple > > > listener case. It may seem to "mostly" work, but it is not reliable and > > > can not be permitted. > > > > > > > threaded > > ??? > > First off, simply being threaded doesn't avoid the issue... it depends on > the particular model being used (ie. the MPM in 2.x...). FreeBSD with clever enough kernel hacking. Just have a look at the http filtering in freebsd for some fun. I am sure someone could do the same with linux. Dw
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patch ?? Ryan Bloom
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patch ?? Jeff Trawick
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patc... Jim Jagielski
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patch ?? Jim Jagielski
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patch ?? Jeff Trawick
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patch ?? Marc Slemko
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patch ?? Jim Jagielski
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patch ?? Jim Jagielski
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patc... Dirk-Willem van Gulik
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patch ?? Marc Slemko
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patc... Dirk-Willem van Gulik
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patch ?? Marc Slemko
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patc... Dirk-Willem van Gulik
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patch ?? Jim Jagielski
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patc... Dirk-Willem van Gulik
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patch ?? Marc Slemko
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patch ?? Bill Stoddard
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patch ?? Jim Jagielski
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patc... Bill Stoddard
- Re: Comments on accept-mutex/single-listen patc... Dirk-Willem van Gulik