On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > So, who among those who would go through the bugs would veto the use > of bugzilla? It may be crap, but I believe less so than GNATS. Pier > already has bugzilla setup on nagoya, so it should be fairly trivial > to add an httpd-2.0 project.
Having tried out just about every bug/ticket/issue tracking system out there, I would suggest that RT be given at least a passing glance before rt.cpan.org is a good example of a very large installation of RT - it tracks issues with all the modules on CPAN. RT does the various things that you seem to want it to do. -- Rich Bowen http://www.ApacheAdmin.com/
