* Justin Erenkrantz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > GNATS (bugs.apache.org), in short, sucks (that's an understatement). > All I want is a usable web interface to manage our bugs. I have > spent way too much time over the last few weeks fighting this > horrible bug system and trying to clean up the entries. > > So, who among those who would go through the bugs would veto the use > of bugzilla? It may be crap, but I believe less so than GNATS. Pier > already has bugzilla setup on nagoya, so it should be fairly trivial > to add an httpd-2.0 project. > I had a look at GNATS this morning, in the hopes of being able to usefully triage and kill any bugs I could. Oh, how wrong I was. I have a fair amount of experience with the debian bug tracking system, which I'd not really recommend in this instance, due to it not having a web based management/submissions system (email only); and bugzilla. GNATS just seemed to be totally unintuitive and very unhelpful. So a (non-commiter's) +1 from here.
Cheers, -Thom
