"Rich Bowen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Rich Bowen wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>>
>>> So, who among those who would go through the bugs would veto the use
>>> of bugzilla? It may be crap, but I believe less so than GNATS. Pier
>>> already has bugzilla setup on nagoya, so it should be fairly trivial
>>> to add an httpd-2.0 project.
>>
>> Having tried out just about every bug/ticket/issue tracking system out
>> there, I would suggest that RT be given at least a passing glance before
>> rt.cpan.org is a good example of a very large installation of RT - it
>> tracks issues with all the modules on CPAN. RT does the various things
>> that you seem to want it to do.
>
> Oh, and, yes, there is a conversion tool for GNATS -> RT
> It is in the contrib/rt-addons directory on wherever mirror you find RT.
> For example,
> ftp://ftp.eu.uu.net/pub/unix/ticketing/rt/contrib/2.0/rt-addons/import-gnats
I believe that Justin was talking about BugZilla because it's already there,
set up and working...
Pier
