+1 On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 9:15 AM Steven Wu <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 > > We should note that the spec PR currently mandates V7 UUID for the > idempotency key. > > On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 5:10 AM Péter Váry <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Eduard Tudenhöfner <[email protected]> ezt írta (időpont: 2025. >> nov. 14., P, 12:48): >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 6:01 AM huaxin gao <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I’d like to start a VOTE to adopt the Iceberg REST Catalog Idempotency >>>> proposal. >>>> >>>> *Motivation:* Mutation retries can double-apply or corrupt metadata >>>> after transient failures. This spec makes retries safe and interoperable. >>>> >>>> *Summary:* >>>> >>>> - >>>> >>>> Optional Idempotency-Key for mutation endpoints only >>>> - >>>> >>>> First request finalizes; duplicates return the original finalized >>>> result >>>> - >>>> >>>> Key is globally unique >>>> - >>>> >>>> Discovery via idempotency-key-lifetime (ISO-8601) >>>> - >>>> >>>> Backwards-compatible; server internals not prescribed >>>> >>>> *Details:* >>>> >>>> - >>>> >>>> - Proposal doc: >>>> >>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WyiIk08JRe8AjWh63txIP4i2xcIUHYQWFrF_1CCS3uw/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.jfecktgonj1i >>>> - Spec PR: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14196 >>>> - Discuss thread: >>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/y91scqfd1g3yd0owbgzrr1d2hm3w78gy >>>> >>>> *Please vote by the end of next Tuesday:* >>>> >>>> [ ] +1 Add these changes to the spec >>>> [ ] +0 >>>> [ ] -1 I have questions and/or concerns >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> >>>> Huaxin >>>> >>>
