+1 (non-binding) On Sat, Nov 15, 2025 at 10:57 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 (non binding) > > Regards > JB > > On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 6:00 AM huaxin gao <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I’d like to start a VOTE to adopt the Iceberg REST Catalog Idempotency > proposal. > > > > Motivation: Mutation retries can double-apply or corrupt metadata after > transient failures. This spec makes retries safe and interoperable. > > > > Summary: > > > > Optional Idempotency-Key for mutation endpoints only > > > > First request finalizes; duplicates return the original finalized result > > > > Key is globally unique > > > > Discovery via idempotency-key-lifetime (ISO-8601) > > > > Backwards-compatible; server internals not prescribed > > > > Details: > > > > Proposal doc: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WyiIk08JRe8AjWh63txIP4i2xcIUHYQWFrF_1CCS3uw/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.jfecktgonj1i > > Spec PR: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14196 > > Discuss thread: > https://lists.apache.org/thread/y91scqfd1g3yd0owbgzrr1d2hm3w78gy > > > > Please vote by the end of next Tuesday: > > > > [ ] +1 Add these changes to the spec > > [ ] +0 > > [ ] -1 I have questions and/or concerns > > > > Best, > > > > Huaxin >
