+1 On Sat, Nov 15, 2025, 1:14 PM Fokko Driesprong <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 > > Op za 15 nov 2025 om 20:39 schreef Aihua Xu <[email protected]>: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Sat, Nov 15, 2025 at 10:57 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (non binding) >>> >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 6:00 AM huaxin gao <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > Hi all, >>> > >>> > I’d like to start a VOTE to adopt the Iceberg REST Catalog Idempotency >>> proposal. >>> > >>> > Motivation: Mutation retries can double-apply or corrupt metadata >>> after transient failures. This spec makes retries safe and interoperable. >>> > >>> > Summary: >>> > >>> > Optional Idempotency-Key for mutation endpoints only >>> > >>> > First request finalizes; duplicates return the original finalized >>> result >>> > >>> > Key is globally unique >>> > >>> > Discovery via idempotency-key-lifetime (ISO-8601) >>> > >>> > Backwards-compatible; server internals not prescribed >>> > >>> > Details: >>> > >>> > Proposal doc: >>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WyiIk08JRe8AjWh63txIP4i2xcIUHYQWFrF_1CCS3uw/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.jfecktgonj1i >>> > Spec PR: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14196 >>> > Discuss thread: >>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/y91scqfd1g3yd0owbgzrr1d2hm3w78gy >>> > >>> > Please vote by the end of next Tuesday: >>> > >>> > [ ] +1 Add these changes to the spec >>> > [ ] +0 >>> > [ ] -1 I have questions and/or concerns >>> > >>> > Best, >>> > >>> > Huaxin >>> >>
