+1 (non-binding) John Zhuge
On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 9:50 AM Ryan Blue <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 9:15 AM Steven Wu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> We should note that the spec PR currently mandates V7 UUID for the >> idempotency key. >> >> On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 5:10 AM Péter Váry <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> Eduard Tudenhöfner <[email protected]> ezt írta (időpont: 2025. >>> nov. 14., P, 12:48): >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 6:01 AM huaxin gao <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> I’d like to start a VOTE to adopt the Iceberg REST Catalog Idempotency >>>>> proposal. >>>>> >>>>> *Motivation:* Mutation retries can double-apply or corrupt metadata >>>>> after transient failures. This spec makes retries safe and interoperable. >>>>> >>>>> *Summary:* >>>>> >>>>> - >>>>> >>>>> Optional Idempotency-Key for mutation endpoints only >>>>> - >>>>> >>>>> First request finalizes; duplicates return the original finalized >>>>> result >>>>> - >>>>> >>>>> Key is globally unique >>>>> - >>>>> >>>>> Discovery via idempotency-key-lifetime (ISO-8601) >>>>> - >>>>> >>>>> Backwards-compatible; server internals not prescribed >>>>> >>>>> *Details:* >>>>> >>>>> - >>>>> >>>>> - Proposal doc: >>>>> >>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WyiIk08JRe8AjWh63txIP4i2xcIUHYQWFrF_1CCS3uw/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.jfecktgonj1i >>>>> - Spec PR: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14196 >>>>> - Discuss thread: >>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/y91scqfd1g3yd0owbgzrr1d2hm3w78gy >>>>> >>>>> *Please vote by the end of next Tuesday:* >>>>> >>>>> [ ] +1 Add these changes to the spec >>>>> [ ] +0 >>>>> [ ] -1 I have questions and/or concerns >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> >>>>> Huaxin >>>>> >>>>
