+1 Op za 15 nov 2025 om 20:39 schreef Aihua Xu <[email protected]>:
> +1 (non-binding) > > On Sat, Nov 15, 2025 at 10:57 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> +1 (non binding) >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 6:00 AM huaxin gao <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > Hi all, >> > >> > I’d like to start a VOTE to adopt the Iceberg REST Catalog Idempotency >> proposal. >> > >> > Motivation: Mutation retries can double-apply or corrupt metadata after >> transient failures. This spec makes retries safe and interoperable. >> > >> > Summary: >> > >> > Optional Idempotency-Key for mutation endpoints only >> > >> > First request finalizes; duplicates return the original finalized result >> > >> > Key is globally unique >> > >> > Discovery via idempotency-key-lifetime (ISO-8601) >> > >> > Backwards-compatible; server internals not prescribed >> > >> > Details: >> > >> > Proposal doc: >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WyiIk08JRe8AjWh63txIP4i2xcIUHYQWFrF_1CCS3uw/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.jfecktgonj1i >> > Spec PR: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14196 >> > Discuss thread: >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/y91scqfd1g3yd0owbgzrr1d2hm3w78gy >> > >> > Please vote by the end of next Tuesday: >> > >> > [ ] +1 Add these changes to the spec >> > [ ] +0 >> > [ ] -1 I have questions and/or concerns >> > >> > Best, >> > >> > Huaxin >> >
