+1 On Mon, Nov 17, 2025 at 8:44 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding) > > Cheers, > Dmitri. > > On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 12:03 AM huaxin gao <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I’d like to start a VOTE to adopt the Iceberg REST Catalog Idempotency >> proposal. >> >> *Motivation:* Mutation retries can double-apply or corrupt metadata >> after transient failures. This spec makes retries safe and interoperable. >> >> *Summary:* >> >> - >> >> Optional Idempotency-Key for mutation endpoints only >> - >> >> First request finalizes; duplicates return the original finalized >> result >> - >> >> Key is globally unique >> - >> >> Discovery via idempotency-key-lifetime (ISO-8601) >> - >> >> Backwards-compatible; server internals not prescribed >> >> *Details:* >> >> - >> >> - Proposal doc: >> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WyiIk08JRe8AjWh63txIP4i2xcIUHYQWFrF_1CCS3uw/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.jfecktgonj1i >> - Spec PR: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14196 >> - Discuss thread: >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/y91scqfd1g3yd0owbgzrr1d2hm3w78gy >> >> *Please vote by the end of next Tuesday:* >> >> [ ] +1 Add these changes to the spec >> [ ] +0 >> [ ] -1 I have questions and/or concerns >> >> Best, >> >> Huaxin >> >
