With 16 +1 votes (9 binding) this passes. Thanks everyone!
On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 1:08 AM Gang Wu <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 12:56 AM Honah J. <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Best Regards, >> Jonas (Honah) >> >> On Mon, Nov 17, 2025 at 10:27 AM Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2025 at 8:44 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Dmitri. >>>> >>>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 12:03 AM huaxin gao <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> I’d like to start a VOTE to adopt the Iceberg REST Catalog Idempotency >>>>> proposal. >>>>> >>>>> *Motivation:* Mutation retries can double-apply or corrupt metadata >>>>> after transient failures. This spec makes retries safe and interoperable. >>>>> >>>>> *Summary:* >>>>> >>>>> - >>>>> >>>>> Optional Idempotency-Key for mutation endpoints only >>>>> - >>>>> >>>>> First request finalizes; duplicates return the original finalized >>>>> result >>>>> - >>>>> >>>>> Key is globally unique >>>>> - >>>>> >>>>> Discovery via idempotency-key-lifetime (ISO-8601) >>>>> - >>>>> >>>>> Backwards-compatible; server internals not prescribed >>>>> >>>>> *Details:* >>>>> >>>>> - >>>>> >>>>> - Proposal doc: >>>>> >>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WyiIk08JRe8AjWh63txIP4i2xcIUHYQWFrF_1CCS3uw/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.jfecktgonj1i >>>>> - Spec PR: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14196 >>>>> - Discuss thread: >>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/y91scqfd1g3yd0owbgzrr1d2hm3w78gy >>>>> >>>>> *Please vote by the end of next Tuesday:* >>>>> >>>>> [ ] +1 Add these changes to the spec >>>>> [ ] +0 >>>>> [ ] -1 I have questions and/or concerns >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> >>>>> Huaxin >>>>> >>>>
