Thanks, Huaxin! I think addressing my comments was the last change so I just approved and merged the PR. Thank you for shepherding this!
On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 11:56 AM huaxin gao <[email protected]> wrote: > With 16 +1 votes (9 binding) this passes. > > Thanks everyone! > > On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 1:08 AM Gang Wu <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 12:56 AM Honah J. <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> Best Regards, >>> Jonas (Honah) >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2025 at 10:27 AM Amogh Jahagirdar <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2025 at 8:44 AM Dmitri Bourlatchkov <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 (non-binding) >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Dmitri. >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 12:03 AM huaxin gao <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>> >>>>>> I’d like to start a VOTE to adopt the Iceberg REST Catalog >>>>>> Idempotency proposal. >>>>>> >>>>>> *Motivation:* Mutation retries can double-apply or corrupt metadata >>>>>> after transient failures. This spec makes retries safe and interoperable. >>>>>> >>>>>> *Summary:* >>>>>> >>>>>> - >>>>>> >>>>>> Optional Idempotency-Key for mutation endpoints only >>>>>> - >>>>>> >>>>>> First request finalizes; duplicates return the original finalized >>>>>> result >>>>>> - >>>>>> >>>>>> Key is globally unique >>>>>> - >>>>>> >>>>>> Discovery via idempotency-key-lifetime (ISO-8601) >>>>>> - >>>>>> >>>>>> Backwards-compatible; server internals not prescribed >>>>>> >>>>>> *Details:* >>>>>> >>>>>> - >>>>>> >>>>>> - Proposal doc: >>>>>> >>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WyiIk08JRe8AjWh63txIP4i2xcIUHYQWFrF_1CCS3uw/edit?tab=t.0#heading=h.jfecktgonj1i >>>>>> - Spec PR: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/14196 >>>>>> - Discuss thread: >>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread/y91scqfd1g3yd0owbgzrr1d2hm3w78gy >>>>>> >>>>>> *Please vote by the end of next Tuesday:* >>>>>> >>>>>> [ ] +1 Add these changes to the spec >>>>>> [ ] +0 >>>>>> [ ] -1 I have questions and/or concerns >>>>>> >>>>>> Best, >>>>>> >>>>>> Huaxin >>>>>> >>>>>
