Actually, I haven't found any integration with tensorflow in AI code. Actually, all integrations are some adapters that allow to load pretrained models (h2o, catboost etc.)
чт, 10 авг. 2023 г. в 13:08, Ivan Daschinsky <ivanda...@gmail.com>: > I am personally for moving to extensions. Alex has already mentioned all > the reasons why it should be done and all of them are quite important. > The module seems to be quite independent and there is no problem to move > it to ignite-extensions. > So I am +1 for moving to ignite-extensions. > > > чт, 10 авг. 2023 г. в 12:45, Kseniya Romanova <ksroman...@apache.org>: > >> > >> > do you know anyone who uses it? >> >> I know some teams, who do. At the last Ignite Summit we had a talk >> featuring Ml module (from the Groovy community). >> Anyway, We need here the module maintainer opinion >> + Alex >> >> On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 3:38 PM Andrey Mashenkov < >> andrey.mashen...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > -1 for removal. >> > 0 for relocation >> > >> > imho, TC resources and module size aren't good arguments for >> > removal/moving. >> > ML tests could be run nightly. >> > ML module contains few integrations (with TensorFlow and other), these >> > optional integrations are wighty and could be moved to extension, >> > but core functionality still can be left untouched if it is highly >> coupled >> > with core Ignite and moving to extension is hard. >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 3:22 PM Anton Vinogradov <a...@apache.org> wrote: >> > >> > > +1 to relocation >> > > >> > > On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 3:09 PM Alex Plehanov <plehanov.a...@gmail.com >> > >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > > > Pavel, do you know anyone who uses it? >> > > > >> > > > Looks like it isn't used at all (no questions on mail lists, no >> > > > tickets), but we spend developers time to build module with every >> > > > Ignite rebuild, we spend users traffic to download module (ML with >> > > > dependencies takes about 1/4 of our binary release package size) and >> > > > we spend team-city resources to test module. >> > > > >> > > > +1 for removing or moving to extensions. >> > > > >> > > > ср, 9 авг. 2023 г. в 14:19, Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupit...@apache.org>: >> > > > > >> > > > > Does it have any outstanding issues? A stable and useful module >> > should >> > > > not >> > > > > be removed just because it does not evolve. >> > > > > >> > > > > On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 1:46 PM Ivan Daschinsky < >> ivanda...@apache.org >> > > >> > > > wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > > Igniters, seems that this module is completely abandoned for >> more >> > > than >> > > > 2 >> > > > > > years. But it is enormous and it seems that nobody wants to take >> > care >> > > > of >> > > > > > it. I suggest just removing it or moving it to extensions (as >> > > option). >> > > > > > WDYT? >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Best regards, >> > Andrey V. Mashenkov >> > >> > > > -- > Sincerely yours, Ivan Daschinskiy > -- Sincerely yours, Ivan Daschinskiy
