A few cents to let you know how abandoned ML module is. 1. Last valuable commit December 9, 2020 - https://github.com/apache/ignite/commit/04f6a33851d9f7bd269a09fdc2c74485b1e01a8a
2. Dependencies and current versions of them: * com.dropbox.core:dropbox-core-sdk:2.1.1 current version is - 5.4.5 [1] * com.github.fommil.netlib:core:1.1.2 - not developed and archived since 2017. Last version released in 2013 [2] * org.apache.commons:commons-rng-core:1.0 current version is 1.5 [3] * com.zaxxer:SparseBitSet:1.0 current version is 1.2 [4] * ai.catboost:catboost-prediction:0.24 current version is 1.2 [5] * ai.h2o:h2o-genmodel:3.26.0.8 current version is 3.42.0.2 [6] ML community make a huge step forward since 2020. So I doubt ML features and tools integrations works as expected nowadays. Those type of Ignite features(abandoned or supported partially) has to be in extensions. [1] https://github.com/dropbox/dropbox-sdk-java [2] https://github.com/fommil/netlib-java [3] https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-rng/commons-rng-core/ [4] https://github.com/brettwooldridge/SparseBitSet [5] https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/ai.catboost/catboost-prediction [6] https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/ai.h2o/h2o-genmodel > 11 авг. 2023 г., в 12:19, Kseniya Romanova <ksroman...@apache.org> написал(а): > > As far as I know, the integration was removed from the Tensorflow side. > > On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 2:04 PM Andrey Mashenkov <andrey.mashen...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Ivan, >> >>> Actually, I haven't found any integration with tensorflow in AI code. >> >> Ok. You are right. >> Tensorflow is mentioned in docs: docs/_docs/setup.adoc. >> >> Adapters may require compilation time dependencies, but these dependencies >> shouldn't be part or release package, >> regardless whether the ML module is a part of Ignite or extensions. WDYT? >> >> On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 1:36 PM Ivan Daschinsky <ivanda...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Actually, I haven't found any integration with tensorflow in AI code. >>> Actually, all integrations are some adapters that allow to load >> pretrained >>> models (h2o, catboost etc.) >>> >>> чт, 10 авг. 2023 г. в 13:08, Ivan Daschinsky <ivanda...@gmail.com>: >>> >>>> I am personally for moving to extensions. Alex has already mentioned >> all >>>> the reasons why it should be done and all of them are quite important. >>>> The module seems to be quite independent and there is no problem to >> move >>>> it to ignite-extensions. >>>> So I am +1 for moving to ignite-extensions. >>>> >>>> >>>> чт, 10 авг. 2023 г. в 12:45, Kseniya Romanova <ksroman...@apache.org>: >>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> do you know anyone who uses it? >>>>> >>>>> I know some teams, who do. At the last Ignite Summit we had a talk >>>>> featuring Ml module (from the Groovy community). >>>>> Anyway, We need here the module maintainer opinion >>>>> + Alex >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 3:38 PM Andrey Mashenkov < >>>>> andrey.mashen...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> -1 for removal. >>>>>> 0 for relocation >>>>>> >>>>>> imho, TC resources and module size aren't good arguments for >>>>>> removal/moving. >>>>>> ML tests could be run nightly. >>>>>> ML module contains few integrations (with TensorFlow and other), >> these >>>>>> optional integrations are wighty and could be moved to extension, >>>>>> but core functionality still can be left untouched if it is highly >>>>> coupled >>>>>> with core Ignite and moving to extension is hard. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 3:22 PM Anton Vinogradov <a...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 to relocation >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 3:09 PM Alex Plehanov < >>> plehanov.a...@gmail.com >>>>>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Pavel, do you know anyone who uses it? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Looks like it isn't used at all (no questions on mail lists, no >>>>>>>> tickets), but we spend developers time to build module with >> every >>>>>>>> Ignite rebuild, we spend users traffic to download module (ML >> with >>>>>>>> dependencies takes about 1/4 of our binary release package size) >>> and >>>>>>>> we spend team-city resources to test module. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 for removing or moving to extensions. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ср, 9 авг. 2023 г. в 14:19, Pavel Tupitsyn < >> ptupit...@apache.org >>>> : >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Does it have any outstanding issues? A stable and useful >> module >>>>>> should >>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>> be removed just because it does not evolve. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 1:46 PM Ivan Daschinsky < >>>>> ivanda...@apache.org >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Igniters, seems that this module is completely abandoned for >>>>> more >>>>>>> than >>>>>>>> 2 >>>>>>>>>> years. But it is enormous and it seems that nobody wants to >>> take >>>>>> care >>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>> it. I suggest just removing it or moving it to extensions >> (as >>>>>>> option). >>>>>>>>>> WDYT? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>> Andrey V. Mashenkov >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Sincerely yours, Ivan Daschinskiy >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Sincerely yours, Ivan Daschinskiy >>> >> >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> Andrey V. Mashenkov >>
