Ivan, > Actually, I haven't found any integration with tensorflow in AI code.
Ok. You are right. Tensorflow is mentioned in docs: docs/_docs/setup.adoc. Adapters may require compilation time dependencies, but these dependencies shouldn't be part or release package, regardless whether the ML module is a part of Ignite or extensions. WDYT? On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 1:36 PM Ivan Daschinsky <ivanda...@gmail.com> wrote: > Actually, I haven't found any integration with tensorflow in AI code. > Actually, all integrations are some adapters that allow to load pretrained > models (h2o, catboost etc.) > > чт, 10 авг. 2023 г. в 13:08, Ivan Daschinsky <ivanda...@gmail.com>: > > > I am personally for moving to extensions. Alex has already mentioned all > > the reasons why it should be done and all of them are quite important. > > The module seems to be quite independent and there is no problem to move > > it to ignite-extensions. > > So I am +1 for moving to ignite-extensions. > > > > > > чт, 10 авг. 2023 г. в 12:45, Kseniya Romanova <ksroman...@apache.org>: > > > >> > > >> > do you know anyone who uses it? > >> > >> I know some teams, who do. At the last Ignite Summit we had a talk > >> featuring Ml module (from the Groovy community). > >> Anyway, We need here the module maintainer opinion > >> + Alex > >> > >> On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 3:38 PM Andrey Mashenkov < > >> andrey.mashen...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > -1 for removal. > >> > 0 for relocation > >> > > >> > imho, TC resources and module size aren't good arguments for > >> > removal/moving. > >> > ML tests could be run nightly. > >> > ML module contains few integrations (with TensorFlow and other), these > >> > optional integrations are wighty and could be moved to extension, > >> > but core functionality still can be left untouched if it is highly > >> coupled > >> > with core Ignite and moving to extension is hard. > >> > > >> > > >> > On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 3:22 PM Anton Vinogradov <a...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > +1 to relocation > >> > > > >> > > On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 3:09 PM Alex Plehanov < > plehanov.a...@gmail.com > >> > > >> > > wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > Pavel, do you know anyone who uses it? > >> > > > > >> > > > Looks like it isn't used at all (no questions on mail lists, no > >> > > > tickets), but we spend developers time to build module with every > >> > > > Ignite rebuild, we spend users traffic to download module (ML with > >> > > > dependencies takes about 1/4 of our binary release package size) > and > >> > > > we spend team-city resources to test module. > >> > > > > >> > > > +1 for removing or moving to extensions. > >> > > > > >> > > > ср, 9 авг. 2023 г. в 14:19, Pavel Tupitsyn <ptupit...@apache.org > >: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Does it have any outstanding issues? A stable and useful module > >> > should > >> > > > not > >> > > > > be removed just because it does not evolve. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 1:46 PM Ivan Daschinsky < > >> ivanda...@apache.org > >> > > > >> > > > wrote: > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Igniters, seems that this module is completely abandoned for > >> more > >> > > than > >> > > > 2 > >> > > > > > years. But it is enormous and it seems that nobody wants to > take > >> > care > >> > > > of > >> > > > > > it. I suggest just removing it or moving it to extensions (as > >> > > option). > >> > > > > > WDYT? > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Best regards, > >> > Andrey V. Mashenkov > >> > > >> > > > > > > -- > > Sincerely yours, Ivan Daschinskiy > > > > > -- > Sincerely yours, Ivan Daschinskiy > -- Best regards, Andrey V. Mashenkov
