Hi all, So I just did a first "mvn clan install -P apache-release" as a test for what a maven release would produce.
- Unfortunately I got two test-failures: IoTDBDeletionIT.test IoTDBDeletionIT.testMerge After disabling those two tests the build passed. Then I had a look at the build results. I did notice that the pom doesn't have an asc (signature), but the sha512 look ok. - The LICANSE file contains invalid paths ... ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/ These don't exist, but seem to have to be changed to: iotdb/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/ However these files don't seem to exist at all: iotdb /src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/parse/ASTErrorNode.java iotdb /src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/parse/ASTNodeOrigin.java iotdb /src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/parse/ASTNode.java - Why is there two LICENSE files? This is quite unusual. - The binary version references libraries that seem to be referenced by the build: joda-time:joda-time org.apache.maven.wagon:wagon-provider-api org.apache.maven:maven-artifact org.apache.maven:maven-artifact-manager org.apache.maven:maven-model org.apache.maven:maven-plugin-api org.apache.maven:maven-profile org.apache.maven:maven-project org.apache.maven:Maven-repository-metadata org.apache.thrift:Libthrift (should be lower-case libthrift) org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-compiler-api org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-container-default org.codehaus.plexus:plexus-utils org.antlr:antlr org.antlr:ST4 org.antlr:antlr3-maven-plugin Guess usually these are dependencies seem to be used by the Maven build and not the built software. This usually isn't mentioned in LICENSE files. - If org.hamcrest:hamcrest-core is mentioned, so should org.hamcrest:hamcrest-library - Then sometimes multiple different versions of one library are used, which is not desirable. - Why are there two versions of NOTICE files (Haven't checked the content as it was quite excessive) - There doesn't seem to be a RELEASE_NOTES file - The maven-wrapper should be updated to the latest version as that version invalidly contained an Apache header which suggests it's an Apache Software. This has been brought up in the incubator list and will probably be mentioned in the future. Please just update the source files with the latest versions of the maven-wrapper library. So ... now I'll got back to my skiing holidays. Just thought I'd report that ... not sure if these findings are release-breakers, however it might be a good idea to address and/or discuss them soon. Chris Am 10.03.19, 10:42 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" <[email protected]>: In other projects, we usually have release notes also in develop. Here we have a section for the next planned version right at the top (but with an "unreleased" appended to the version) and add stuff as it comes in. For a release the "unreleased" is removed and merged to master, then a new entry for the next version is added. Chris Outlook für Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> herunterladen ________________________________ From: 吴晟 Sheng Wu <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2019 4:53:00 AM To: dev; dev Subject: Re: Do we have a plan to release the first normal version of IoTDB this month? Hi. Release note should be kept in master or further codes, I think. Users may be interesting in the changes of old versions, in order to choose right version. And, make sense to create a new branch to do release, and versiob update. You could make the version to 0.9.0-snapshot, after the release branch created. Sheng Wu Apache SkyWalking, ShardingSphere, Zipkin From Wu Sheng 's phone. ------------------ Original ------------------ From: Xiangdong Huang <[email protected]> Date: Sun,Mar 10,2019 11:48 AM To: dev <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Do we have a plan to release the first normal version of IoTDB this month? Hi, Do we put this release note into the master branch, or create a new branch called branch-0.8.0 and put this note into that branch? (In the pom file of the master branch, the version is still 0.8.0-SNAPSHOT) Best, ----------------------------------- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 Julian Feinauer <[email protected]> 于2019年3月10日周日 上午4:07写道： > Hi all, > > I just prepared the initial version of the RELEASE_NOTES as PR in [1]. > I just integrated all closed Jira issues. > Now we should try to add all further (mentionable) improvements. > Personally, I think this is not to crucial as this is the first apache > release, so the question "what changed" or what changed incompatible is not > that crucial as for further releases. > > Best > Julian > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-iotdb/pull/91 > > Am 09.03.19, 11:48 schrieb "Justin Mclean" <[email protected]>: > > Hi, > > > In brief, there are four steps: (1) setting Maven configuration; (2) > > creating the release branch and prepare the codebase; (3) mvn > release and > > deploy and so on; (4) vote. > > You also need to check the LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER files in the > release and we can help you with that. > > Thanks, > Justin > >
