Hi, Thank to the answer
On my side, it's ok too Antonio 2016-10-20 22:42 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <philippe.moua...@gmail.com>: > Hello, > On my side, I consider work finished for this version. > AFAIK there are 2 pending issues: > > - JSON : Felix has a patch > - Issue reported yesterday by milamber : A rapid fix can be to increase > precision (not blocker as here since 2.13) > > > Regards > Philippe > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues < > ra0...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > The release of 3.1 is it still planned? > > > > Antonio > > > > 2016-10-07 19:42 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <philippe.moua...@gmail.com > >: > > > > > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 7:40 PM, Felix Schumacher < > > > felix.schumac...@internetallee.de> wrote: > > > > > > > Am 07.10.2016 um 19:29 schrieb Philippe Mouawad: > > > > > > > >> Hello, > > > >> Meanwhile jodd manager gave me some feedback, next release will only > > > >> support Java 8. > > > >> > > > >> So we can either decide to migrate to Java8 (only building), I can > > this > > > >> way > > > >> include the new Browser feature and this new version. > > > >> Or we stick to Java 7 hoping that next 3.2 is not too far which I am > > > >> afraid > > > >> will not be the case. > > > >> > > > > I am still in favour of staying on java 7 for this release and hoping > > for > > > > a short period till the next release. > > > > > > > > I think we can live with the poor(er) performance of jodd. > > > > > > > > > > I wanted to introduce the new Browser faster also. > > > But Ok let's stick to Java 7 :-) > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Felix > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > >> Regards > > > >> Philippe > > > >> > > > >> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues < > > > >> ra0...@gmail.com> > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> +1 > > > >>> > > > >>> Antonio > > > >>> > > > >>> 2016-10-02 21:33 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad < > > > philippe.moua...@gmail.com > > > >>> >: > > > >>> > > > >>> Hello > > > >>>> Work on my side is finished for 3.1 upcoming release. > > > >>>> Except for jsoup and jodd upgrade but as we have no real > visibility > > on > > > >>>> release we might decide to proceed with 3.1 release process. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Regards > > > >>>> Philippe > > > >>>> > > > >>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Philippe Mouawad < > > > >>>> philippe.moua...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues < > > > >>>>> ra0...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Hi, > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> 2016-09-27 23:43 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad < > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>> philippe.moua...@gmail.com > > > >>> > > > >>>> : > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>>> Hello, > > > >>>>>>> I would like if possible to integrate the new release of jodd > > which > > > >>>>>>> contains an important performance improvement. It is supposed > to > > be > > > >>>>>>> released in few days. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Do you know when? > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> No, he said last week it would happen in 2 weeks. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> Have you got a link which explain the performance improvement? > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/328 > > > >>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/327 > > > >>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/329 > > > >>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/330 > > > >>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/331 > > > >>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/332 > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>>> On my side I would like if possible to fix: > > > >>>>>>> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60015 > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> +1 to wait to the fix > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> It may not be simple. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> I have asked a question on dev mailing list. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> I have seen your mail but I don't see question > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> I was waiting for remarks on analysis. > > > >>>>> I may not have the whole picture. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>>> But if too complex we can wait for 3.2 > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> Regards > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Milamber < > milam...@apache.org> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>> > > > >>>>> Hello, > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Ready? I can start the RC1 the 2nd October? > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Are you ok? > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Milamber > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> On 13/09/2016 15:20, Milamber wrote: > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> Hello, > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Are you willing to start the next release process withing 1 > to > > 2 > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> weeks? > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> I > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> can act as RM. > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> The next release will keep the Java 7 support (probably this > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> release > > > >>>> > > > >>>>> will > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> be the last with Java 7 support). > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> What are the bugs which will must be fixed before the next > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> release? > > > >>> > > > >>>> If you want add an improvement before the next release, please > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> indicate > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> now. > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Milamber > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> -- > > > >>>>>>> Cordialement. > > > >>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad. > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> -- > > > >>>>> Cordialement. > > > >>>>> Philippe Mouawad. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>> -- > > > >>>> Cordialement. > > > >>>> Philippe Mouawad. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Cordialement. > > > Philippe Mouawad. > > > > > > > > > -- > Cordialement. > Philippe Mouawad. >