I will start the RC1 of 3.1 release tomorrow. Stop me now if I need to wait.
Milamber
On 31/10/2016 23:18, Philippe Mouawad wrote:
On Sunday, October 30, 2016, Philippe Mouawad <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
[email protected]
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote:
As remaining work for 3.1, I have in mind this:
- It would be nice to deprecated BSF elements
I will do it tomorrow
Done
- Upgrade somes jars , I think there was releases of Apache libraries
that we use
Done.
- Update some screenshots for listener that have been affected by
changes
- Include https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57305 and
some code sample (I don't know where). Wyatt and Felix have spent some time
on this, it would be nice to include it before 3.1
Done by Felix
- Maybe document what properties to disable when generating a report
with default 3.0 properties using a 3.1 version
- jmeter.save.saveservice.connect_time=false
- #jmeter.save.saveservice.sent_bytes=false
Should we do that ?
Besides, I updated docs to improve Home page and mention most recent
features to new comers and old users.
It lacks screenshots in my opinion but I don't know how to improve.
Bon courage !
Regards
Philippe
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
[email protected]
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote:
Hi Milamber,
3.1 is not a "small" improvement release and should not be presented
like this in my opinion.
It is a medium to major release:
- 54 Enhancements
- 28 Bug fixes
There is a lot of new important features:
- New sent bytes metric computed and available in reports
- Enabled connect metric developed by Andrei in previous version and
now available in Report
- Ability to handle big responses. In the era of video, big
images... I think it's important to highlight
- Handling of CLOBs / Blobs
- __groovy function which allows now users to fully abandon
Beanshell and gain performances and Groovy features
- Many Report / Dashboard fixes and improvements (The screenshots
need to be updated, I unfortunately won't be able to do that before 31/10)
*AND
*:
- new Top5 Errors by sampler table in Dashboard
- new "Response Time Overview" graph
- new "Connect Time Over Time " graph
- new report containing min/max and percentiles graphs
- Active Threads Over Time stack lines
In addition to these features, big number of fixes and nice improvements:
- JSON Extractor
- UX in CSV Dataset,
- Sane HTML viewer
- Performance and memory improvements
- ....
Regards
Philippe
On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Milamber <[email protected]
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote:
I can start the RC1 the 30 oct. or 31 oct as RM.
In waiting, we can start to add some New and Noteworthy screenshots
even if the 3.1 release is small improvement release.
On 21/10/2016 09:16, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues wrote:
Hi,
Thank to the answer
On my side, it's ok too
Antonio
2016-10-20 22:42 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <
[email protected]
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>>:
Hello,
On my side, I consider work finished for this version.
AFAIK there are 2 pending issues:
- JSON : Felix has a patch
- Issue reported yesterday by milamber : A rapid fix can be to
increase
precision (not blocker as here since 2.13)
Regards
Philippe
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
[email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>>
wrote:
Hi,
The release of 3.1 is it still planned?
Antonio
2016-10-07 19:42 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <
[email protected]
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>
:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 7:40 PM, Felix Schumacher <
[email protected]
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>>
wrote:
Am 07.10.2016 um 19:29 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
Hello,
Meanwhile jodd manager gave me some feedback, next release will
only
support Java 8.
So we can either decide to migrate to Java8 (only building), I can
this
way
include the new Browser feature and this new version.
Or we stick to Java 7 hoping that next 3.2 is not too far which I
am
afraid
will not be the case.
I am still in favour of staying on java 7 for this release and
hoping
for
a short period till the next release.
I think we can live with the poor(er) performance of jodd.
I wanted to introduce the new Browser faster also.
But Ok let's stick to Java 7 :-)
Regards,
Felix
Regards
Philippe
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
[email protected]
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>>
wrote:
+1
Antonio
2016-10-02 21:33 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <
[email protected]
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>
:
Hello
Work on my side is finished for 3.1 upcoming release.
Except for jsoup and jodd upgrade but as we have no real
visibility
on
release we might decide to proceed with 3.1 release process.
Regards
Philippe
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
[email protected]
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>>
wrote:
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
[email protected]
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote:
Hi,
2016-09-27 23:43 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <
[email protected]
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>
:
Hello,
I would like if possible to integrate the new release of jodd
which
contains an important performance improvement. It is supposed
to
be
released in few days.
Do you know when?
No, he said last week it would happen in 2 weeks.
Have you got a link which explain the performance improvement?
https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/328
https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/327
https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/329
https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/330
https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/331
https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/332
On my side I would like if possible to fix:
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60015
+1 to wait to the fix
It may not be simple.
I have asked a question on dev mailing list.
I have seen your mail but I don't see question
I was waiting for remarks on analysis.
I may not have the whole picture.
But if too complex we can wait for 3.2
Regards
On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Milamber <
[email protected]
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>>
wrote:
Hello,
Ready? I can start the RC1 the 2nd October?
Are you ok?
Milamber
On 13/09/2016 15:20, Milamber wrote:
Hello,
Are you willing to start the next release process withing 1
to
2
weeks?
I
can act as RM.
The next release will keep the Java 7 support (probably
this
release
will
be the last with Java 7 support).
What are the bugs which will must be fixed before the next
release?
If you want add an improvement before the next release,
please
indicate
now.
Milamber
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
