For me you can proceed. Thanks in advance. On Wednesday, November 2, 2016, Milamber <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I will start the RC1 of 3.1 release tomorrow. Stop me now if I need to > wait. > > Milamber > > On 31/10/2016 23:18, Philippe Mouawad wrote: > >> On Sunday, October 30, 2016, Philippe Mouawad <[email protected] >> > >> wrote: >> >> >>> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Philippe Mouawad < >>> [email protected] >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >>> >>> As remaining work for 3.1, I have in mind this: >>>> >>>> - It would be nice to deprecated BSF elements >>>> >>>> I will do it tomorrow >>>> >>> Done >> >> - Upgrade somes jars , I think there was releases of Apache libraries >>>> that we use >>>> >>>> Done. >>>> - Update some screenshots for listener that have been affected by >>>> changes >>>> - Include https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57305 and >>>> some code sample (I don't know where). Wyatt and Felix have spent >>>> some time >>>> on this, it would be nice to include it before 3.1 >>>> >>>> Done by Felix >>>> - Maybe document what properties to disable when generating a report >>>> with default 3.0 properties using a 3.1 version >>>> - jmeter.save.saveservice.connect_time=false >>>> - #jmeter.save.saveservice.sent_bytes=false >>>> >>>> >>>> Should we do that ? >> >> >> >> Besides, I updated docs to improve Home page and mention most recent >> features to new comers and old users. >> It lacks screenshots in my opinion but I don't know how to improve. >> >> >>>> Bon courage ! >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> >>>> Philippe >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Philippe Mouawad < >>>> [email protected] >>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Milamber, >>>>> 3.1 is not a "small" improvement release and should not be presented >>>>> like this in my opinion. >>>>> It is a medium to major release: >>>>> >>>>> - 54 Enhancements >>>>> - 28 Bug fixes >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> There is a lot of new important features: >>>>> >>>>> - New sent bytes metric computed and available in reports >>>>> - Enabled connect metric developed by Andrei in previous version >>>>> and >>>>> now available in Report >>>>> - Ability to handle big responses. In the era of video, big >>>>> images... I think it's important to highlight >>>>> - Handling of CLOBs / Blobs >>>>> - __groovy function which allows now users to fully abandon >>>>> Beanshell and gain performances and Groovy features >>>>> - Many Report / Dashboard fixes and improvements (The screenshots >>>>> need to be updated, I unfortunately won't be able to do that >>>>> before 31/10) *AND >>>>> *: >>>>> - new Top5 Errors by sampler table in Dashboard >>>>> - new "Response Time Overview" graph >>>>> - new "Connect Time Over Time " graph >>>>> - new report containing min/max and percentiles graphs >>>>> - Active Threads Over Time stack lines >>>>> >>>>> In addition to these features, big number of fixes and nice >>>>> improvements: >>>>> >>>>> - JSON Extractor >>>>> - UX in CSV Dataset, >>>>> - Sane HTML viewer >>>>> - Performance and memory improvements >>>>> - .... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> >>>>> Philippe >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Milamber <[email protected] >>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I can start the RC1 the 30 oct. or 31 oct as RM. >>>>>> >>>>>> In waiting, we can start to add some New and Noteworthy screenshots >>>>>> even if the 3.1 release is small improvement release. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 21/10/2016 09:16, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank to the answer >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On my side, it's ok too >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Antonio >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2016-10-20 22:42 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad < >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>>: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On my side, I consider work finished for this version. >>>>>>>> AFAIK there are 2 pending issues: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - JSON : Felix has a patch >>>>>>>> - Issue reported yesterday by milamber : A rapid fix can be to >>>>>>>> increase >>>>>>>> precision (not blocker as here since 2.13) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>> Philippe >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues < >>>>>>>> [email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected] >>>>>>>> ');>> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The release of 3.1 is it still planned? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Antonio >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 2016-10-07 19:42 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad < >>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> >>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 7:40 PM, Felix Schumacher < >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected] >>>>>>>>>> ');>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Am 07.10.2016 um 19:29 schrieb Philippe Mouawad: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Meanwhile jodd manager gave me some feedback, next release will >>>>>>>>>>>> only >>>>>>>>>>>> support Java 8. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> So we can either decide to migrate to Java8 (only building), I >>>>>>>>>>>> can >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> way >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> include the new Browser feature and this new version. >>>>>>>>>>>> Or we stick to Java 7 hoping that next 3.2 is not too far which >>>>>>>>>>>> I >>>>>>>>>>>> am >>>>>>>>>>>> afraid >>>>>>>>>>>> will not be the case. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I am still in favour of staying on java 7 for this release and >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> hoping >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>> a short period till the next release. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I think we can live with the poor(er) performance of jodd. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I wanted to introduce the new Browser faster also. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> But Ok let's stick to Java 7 :-) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Felix >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues < >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Antonio >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-10-02 21:33 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad < >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hello >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Work on my side is finished for 3.1 upcoming release. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Except for jsoup and jodd upgrade but as we have no real >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> visibility >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> on >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> release we might decide to proceed with 3.1 release process. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Philippe Mouawad < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-09-27 23:43 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would like if possible to integrate the new release of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jodd >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> contains an important performance improvement. It is supposed >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> released in few days. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Do you know when? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, he said last week it would happen in 2 weeks. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you got a link which explain the performance >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> improvement? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/328 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/327 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/329 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/330 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/331 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/332 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On my side I would like if possible to fix: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60015 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 to wait to the fix >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It may not be simple. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have asked a question on dev mailing list. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have seen your mail but I don't see question >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was waiting for remarks on analysis. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I may not have the whole picture. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But if too complex we can wait for 3.2 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Milamber < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ready? I can start the RC1 the 2nd October? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you ok? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Milamber >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 13/09/2016 15:20, Milamber wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you willing to start the next release process withing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> weeks? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can act as RM. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The next release will keep the Java 7 support (probably >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be the last with Java 7 support). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What are the bugs which will must be fixed before the next >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you want add an improvement before the next release, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> please >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> indicate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Milamber >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cordialement. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cordialement. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cordialement. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Cordialement. >>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Cordialement. >>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Cordialement. >>>>> Philippe Mouawad. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> Cordialement. >>>> Philippe Mouawad. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> Cordialement. >>> Philippe Mouawad. >>> >>> >>> >>> > -- Cordialement. Philippe Mouawad.
