Great :-) Antonio
2016-10-21 11:54 GMT+02:00 Milamber <milam...@apache.org>: > > I can start the RC1 the 30 oct. or 31 oct as RM. > > In waiting, we can start to add some New and Noteworthy screenshots even > if the 3.1 release is small improvement release. > > > > On 21/10/2016 09:16, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Thank to the answer >> >> On my side, it's ok too >> >> Antonio >> >> 2016-10-20 22:42 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <philippe.moua...@gmail.com>: >> >> Hello, >>> On my side, I consider work finished for this version. >>> AFAIK there are 2 pending issues: >>> >>> - JSON : Felix has a patch >>> - Issue reported yesterday by milamber : A rapid fix can be to >>> increase >>> precision (not blocker as here since 2.13) >>> >>> >>> Regards >>> Philippe >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues < >>> ra0...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>>> >>>> The release of 3.1 is it still planned? >>>> >>>> Antonio >>>> >>>> 2016-10-07 19:42 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <philippe.moua...@gmail.com >>>> : >>>> >>>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 7:40 PM, Felix Schumacher < >>>>> felix.schumac...@internetallee.de> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Am 07.10.2016 um 19:29 schrieb Philippe Mouawad: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>> Meanwhile jodd manager gave me some feedback, next release will only >>>>>>> support Java 8. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So we can either decide to migrate to Java8 (only building), I can >>>>>>> >>>>>> this >>>> >>>>> way >>>>>>> include the new Browser feature and this new version. >>>>>>> Or we stick to Java 7 hoping that next 3.2 is not too far which I am >>>>>>> afraid >>>>>>> will not be the case. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I am still in favour of staying on java 7 for this release and hoping >>>>>> >>>>> for >>>> >>>>> a short period till the next release. >>>>>> >>>>>> I think we can live with the poor(er) performance of jodd. >>>>>> >>>>>> I wanted to introduce the new Browser faster also. >>>>> But Ok let's stick to Java 7 :-) >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Felix >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>>> Philippe >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues < >>>>>>> ra0...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Antonio >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2016-10-02 21:33 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad < >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> philippe.moua...@gmail.com >>>>> >>>>>> : >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hello >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Work on my side is finished for 3.1 upcoming release. >>>>>>>>> Except for jsoup and jodd upgrade but as we have no real >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> visibility >>> >>>> on >>>> >>>>> release we might decide to proceed with 3.1 release process. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>> Philippe >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Philippe Mouawad < >>>>>>>>> philippe.moua...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues < >>>>>>>>>> ra0...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 2016-09-27 23:43 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad < >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> philippe.moua...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I would like if possible to integrate the new release of jodd >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> which >>>> >>>>> contains an important performance improvement. It is supposed >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> to >>> >>>> be >>>> >>>>> released in few days. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Do you know when? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> No, he said last week it would happen in 2 weeks. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Have you got a link which explain the performance improvement? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/328 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/327 >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/329 >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/330 >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/331 >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/332 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On my side I would like if possible to fix: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60015 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> +1 to wait to the fix >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It may not be simple. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I have asked a question on dev mailing list. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I have seen your mail but I don't see question >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I was waiting for remarks on analysis. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I may not have the whole picture. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> But if too complex we can wait for 3.2 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Milamber < >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> milam...@apache.org> >>> >>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Ready? I can start the RC1 the 2nd October? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you ok? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Milamber >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 13/09/2016 15:20, Milamber wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you willing to start the next release process withing 1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>> >>>> 2 >>>> >>>>> weeks? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> can act as RM. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The next release will keep the Java 7 support (probably this >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> release >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> be the last with Java 7 support). >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> What are the bugs which will must be fixed before the next >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> release? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> If you want add an improvement before the next release, please >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> indicate >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> now. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Milamber >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> Cordialement. >>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Cordialement. >>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Cordialement. >>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Cordialement. >>>>> Philippe Mouawad. >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Cordialement. >>> Philippe Mouawad. >>> >>> >
