As remaining work for 3.1, I have in mind this: - It would be nice to deprecated BSF elements - Upgrade somes jars , I think there was releases of Apache libraries that we use - Update some screenshots for listener that have been affected by changes - Include https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57305 and some code sample (I don't know where). Wyatt and Felix have spent some time on this, it would be nice to include it before 3.1 - Maybe document what properties to disable when generating a report with default 3.0 properties using a 3.1 version - jmeter.save.saveservice.connect_time=false - #jmeter.save.saveservice.sent_bytes=false
Bon courage ! Regards Philippe On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Philippe Mouawad < philippe.moua...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Milamber, > 3.1 is not a "small" improvement release and should not be presented like > this in my opinion. > It is a medium to major release: > > - 54 Enhancements > - 28 Bug fixes > > > There is a lot of new important features: > > - New sent bytes metric computed and available in reports > - Enabled connect metric developed by Andrei in previous version and > now available in Report > - Ability to handle big responses. In the era of video, big images... > I think it's important to highlight > - Handling of CLOBs / Blobs > - __groovy function which allows now users to fully abandon Beanshell > and gain performances and Groovy features > - Many Report / Dashboard fixes and improvements (The screenshots need > to be updated, I unfortunately won't be able to do that before 31/10) *AND > *: > - new Top5 Errors by sampler table in Dashboard > - new "Response Time Overview" graph > - new "Connect Time Over Time " graph > - new report containing min/max and percentiles graphs > - Active Threads Over Time stack lines > > In addition to these features, big number of fixes and nice improvements: > > - JSON Extractor > - UX in CSV Dataset, > - Sane HTML viewer > - Performance and memory improvements > - .... > > > > > Regards > > Philippe > > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Milamber <milam...@apache.org> wrote: > >> >> I can start the RC1 the 30 oct. or 31 oct as RM. >> >> In waiting, we can start to add some New and Noteworthy screenshots even >> if the 3.1 release is small improvement release. >> >> >> >> On 21/10/2016 09:16, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Thank to the answer >>> >>> On my side, it's ok too >>> >>> Antonio >>> >>> 2016-10-20 22:42 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <philippe.moua...@gmail.com >>> >: >>> >>> Hello, >>>> On my side, I consider work finished for this version. >>>> AFAIK there are 2 pending issues: >>>> >>>> - JSON : Felix has a patch >>>> - Issue reported yesterday by milamber : A rapid fix can be to >>>> increase >>>> precision (not blocker as here since 2.13) >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Philippe >>>> >>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues < >>>> ra0...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> The release of 3.1 is it still planned? >>>>> >>>>> Antonio >>>>> >>>>> 2016-10-07 19:42 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad < >>>>> philippe.moua...@gmail.com >>>>> : >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 7:40 PM, Felix Schumacher < >>>>>> felix.schumac...@internetallee.de> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Am 07.10.2016 um 19:29 schrieb Philippe Mouawad: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>> Meanwhile jodd manager gave me some feedback, next release will only >>>>>>>> support Java 8. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So we can either decide to migrate to Java8 (only building), I can >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> this >>>>> >>>>>> way >>>>>>>> include the new Browser feature and this new version. >>>>>>>> Or we stick to Java 7 hoping that next 3.2 is not too far which I am >>>>>>>> afraid >>>>>>>> will not be the case. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I am still in favour of staying on java 7 for this release and >>>>>>> hoping >>>>>>> >>>>>> for >>>>> >>>>>> a short period till the next release. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I think we can live with the poor(er) performance of jodd. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I wanted to introduce the new Browser faster also. >>>>>> But Ok let's stick to Java 7 :-) >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> Felix >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>> Philippe >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues < >>>>>>>> ra0...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Antonio >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 2016-10-02 21:33 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad < >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> philippe.moua...@gmail.com >>>>>> >>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hello >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Work on my side is finished for 3.1 upcoming release. >>>>>>>>>> Except for jsoup and jodd upgrade but as we have no real >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> visibility >>>> >>>>> on >>>>> >>>>>> release we might decide to proceed with 3.1 release process. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>> Philippe >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Philippe Mouawad < >>>>>>>>>> philippe.moua...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues < >>>>>>>>>>> ra0...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-09-27 23:43 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad < >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> philippe.moua...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I would like if possible to integrate the new release of jodd >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> which >>>>> >>>>>> contains an important performance improvement. It is supposed >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>> >>>>> be >>>>> >>>>>> released in few days. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you know when? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> No, he said last week it would happen in 2 weeks. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Have you got a link which explain the performance improvement? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/328 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/327 >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/329 >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/330 >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/331 >>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/332 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On my side I would like if possible to fix: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60015 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 to wait to the fix >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> It may not be simple. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I have asked a question on dev mailing list. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I have seen your mail but I don't see question >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I was waiting for remarks on analysis. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I may not have the whole picture. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> But if too complex we can wait for 3.2 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Milamber < >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> milam...@apache.org> >>>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Ready? I can start the RC1 the 2nd October? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you ok? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Milamber >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 13/09/2016 15:20, Milamber wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you willing to start the next release process withing 1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>> >>>>> 2 >>>>> >>>>>> weeks? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> can act as RM. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The next release will keep the Java 7 support (probably this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> be the last with Java 7 support). >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What are the bugs which will must be fixed before the next >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> If you want add an improvement before the next release, please >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> indicate >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> now. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Milamber >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> Cordialement. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Cordialement. >>>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Cordialement. >>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Cordialement. >>>>>> Philippe Mouawad. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Cordialement. >>>> Philippe Mouawad. >>>> >>>> >> > > > -- > Cordialement. > Philippe Mouawad. > > > -- Cordialement. Philippe Mouawad.
