On Sunday, October 30, 2016, Philippe Mouawad <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Philippe Mouawad < > [email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > >> As remaining work for 3.1, I have in mind this: >> >> - It would be nice to deprecated BSF elements >> >> I will do it tomorrow > Done > >> - Upgrade somes jars , I think there was releases of Apache libraries >> that we use >> >> Done. > >> >> - Update some screenshots for listener that have been affected by >> changes >> - Include https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57305 and >> some code sample (I don't know where). Wyatt and Felix have spent some >> time >> on this, it would be nice to include it before 3.1 >> >> Done by Felix > >> >> - Maybe document what properties to disable when generating a report >> with default 3.0 properties using a 3.1 version >> - jmeter.save.saveservice.connect_time=false >> - #jmeter.save.saveservice.sent_bytes=false >> >> Should we do that ? Besides, I updated docs to improve Home page and mention most recent features to new comers and old users. It lacks screenshots in my opinion but I don't know how to improve. > >> >> >> Bon courage ! >> >> Regards >> >> Philippe >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Philippe Mouawad < >> [email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >> >>> Hi Milamber, >>> 3.1 is not a "small" improvement release and should not be presented >>> like this in my opinion. >>> It is a medium to major release: >>> >>> - 54 Enhancements >>> - 28 Bug fixes >>> >>> >>> There is a lot of new important features: >>> >>> - New sent bytes metric computed and available in reports >>> - Enabled connect metric developed by Andrei in previous version and >>> now available in Report >>> - Ability to handle big responses. In the era of video, big >>> images... I think it's important to highlight >>> - Handling of CLOBs / Blobs >>> - __groovy function which allows now users to fully abandon >>> Beanshell and gain performances and Groovy features >>> - Many Report / Dashboard fixes and improvements (The screenshots >>> need to be updated, I unfortunately won't be able to do that before >>> 31/10) *AND >>> *: >>> - new Top5 Errors by sampler table in Dashboard >>> - new "Response Time Overview" graph >>> - new "Connect Time Over Time " graph >>> - new report containing min/max and percentiles graphs >>> - Active Threads Over Time stack lines >>> >>> In addition to these features, big number of fixes and nice improvements: >>> >>> - JSON Extractor >>> - UX in CSV Dataset, >>> - Sane HTML viewer >>> - Performance and memory improvements >>> - .... >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Philippe >>> >>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Milamber <[email protected] >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> I can start the RC1 the 30 oct. or 31 oct as RM. >>>> >>>> In waiting, we can start to add some New and Noteworthy screenshots >>>> even if the 3.1 release is small improvement release. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 21/10/2016 09:16, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Thank to the answer >>>>> >>>>> On my side, it's ok too >>>>> >>>>> Antonio >>>>> >>>>> 2016-10-20 22:42 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad < >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>>: >>>>> >>>>> Hello, >>>>>> On my side, I consider work finished for this version. >>>>>> AFAIK there are 2 pending issues: >>>>>> >>>>>> - JSON : Felix has a patch >>>>>> - Issue reported yesterday by milamber : A rapid fix can be to >>>>>> increase >>>>>> precision (not blocker as here since 2.13) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> Philippe >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues < >>>>>> [email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The release of 3.1 is it still planned? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Antonio >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2016-10-07 19:42 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad < >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> >>>>>>> : >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 7:40 PM, Felix Schumacher < >>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Am 07.10.2016 um 19:29 schrieb Philippe Mouawad: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>> Meanwhile jodd manager gave me some feedback, next release will >>>>>>>>>> only >>>>>>>>>> support Java 8. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> So we can either decide to migrate to Java8 (only building), I can >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> way >>>>>>>>>> include the new Browser feature and this new version. >>>>>>>>>> Or we stick to Java 7 hoping that next 3.2 is not too far which I >>>>>>>>>> am >>>>>>>>>> afraid >>>>>>>>>> will not be the case. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I am still in favour of staying on java 7 for this release and >>>>>>>>> hoping >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> for >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> a short period till the next release. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I think we can live with the poor(er) performance of jodd. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I wanted to introduce the new Browser faster also. >>>>>>>> But Ok let's stick to Java 7 :-) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>> Felix >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>> Philippe >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues < >>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> +1 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Antonio >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 2016-10-02 21:33 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad < >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hello >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Work on my side is finished for 3.1 upcoming release. >>>>>>>>>>>> Except for jsoup and jodd upgrade but as we have no real >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> visibility >>>>>> >>>>>>> on >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> release we might decide to proceed with 3.1 release process. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Philippe Mouawad < >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues < >>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-09-27 23:43 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would like if possible to integrate the new release of jodd >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> which >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> contains an important performance improvement. It is supposed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>> >>>>>>> be >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> released in few days. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you know when? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, he said last week it would happen in 2 weeks. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you got a link which explain the performance improvement? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/328 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/327 >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/329 >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/330 >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/331 >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/332 >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On my side I would like if possible to fix: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60015 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 to wait to the fix >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It may not be simple. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I have asked a question on dev mailing list. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have seen your mail but I don't see question >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was waiting for remarks on analysis. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I may not have the whole picture. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> But if too complex we can wait for 3.2 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Milamber < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ready? I can start the RC1 the 2nd October? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you ok? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Milamber >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 13/09/2016 15:20, Milamber wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you willing to start the next release process withing 1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>> >>>>>>> 2 >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> weeks? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can act as RM. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The next release will keep the Java 7 support (probably >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> be the last with Java 7 support). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What are the bugs which will must be fixed before the next >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you want add an improvement before the next release, >>>>>>>>>>>> please >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> indicate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Milamber >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cordialement. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> Cordialement. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> Cordialement. >>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Cordialement. >>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Cordialement. >>>>>> Philippe Mouawad. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Cordialement. >>> Philippe Mouawad. >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Cordialement. >> Philippe Mouawad. >> >> >> > > > -- > Cordialement. > Philippe Mouawad. > > > -- Cordialement. Philippe Mouawad.
