So, should we wait a bit more before adding Apache commons? On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 12/03/2017 12:25 PM, Rafael Weingärtner wrote: > > Gilles, I actually do not know the reason behind this limit on data > > sources. I am fairly new to kibble project. Let´s see what Daniel or > others > > have to say about this limit. > > The limit is somewhat arbitrary, but we would favor smaller projects > over behemoths like Commons at the moment. We're trying to, at one hand, > figure out how many sources we can cram into the single demo box we have > at our disposal, while also trying to get as many projects involved as > possible. I know from elsewhere that we would need something like 5-6 > times the resources we currently have, if we were to put the entire ASF > into the Kibble demo, and we don't currently have a budget for that. > > Now, the entire ASF would be around 7,500 source objects, so 100 is a > very low limit, granted. If the Commons project has an actual interest > in using Kibble for reports and what not, we can get them added - the > thing to remember here is merely that we'd favor getting as much bang > for our buck as possible. > > I did some quick checks of available resources, and we're not using a > whole bunch yet, so we can probably aim for 200 source objects for now, > and still be fine. > > With regards, > Daniel. > > > > > On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 10:30 PM, Gilles Sadowski <er...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > >> Hi. > >> > >> On 2017-12-02 21:27, Rafael Weingärtner <rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >>> How should I handle adding apache commons? > >>> > >>> If I add all of the sources we will go over the limit of 100 sources. > In > >>> Github there are 72 projects, and on Jira there other 70+ projects. > >> > >> A lot of projects, yes; but most of them are quite small, and many > >> have very low activity. > >> Would that mitigate usage resources? > >> If the number above is a hard limit, I'll ask the ML for a priority > list... > >> > >>> At > >>> least the mailing list seems to be only the ones found here: > >>> https://lists.apache.org/list.html?u...@commons.apache.org > >> > >> The "dev" ML should rather be selected. > >> > >> Gilles > >> > >>> > >>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Gilles Sadowski <er...@apache.org> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hello. > >>>> > >>>> On 2017-11-27 19:26, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> wrote: > >>>>> [...] > >>>>> > >>>>> PS: Please note, we have limited capacity for these tests. We cannot > >>>>> have every single ASF project in the demo, and we reserve the rights > >> to > >>>>> pick the projects that can participate, should we get a lot of > >> requests. > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> Would you consider adding the "Commons"[1] projects? > >>>> > >>>> Regards, > >>>> Gilles > >>>> > >>>> [1] http://commons.apache.org/ > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Rafael Weingärtner > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > -- Rafael Weingärtner
