ok, I will do that. On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 12/04/2017 12:41 PM, Rafael Weingärtner wrote: > > So, should we wait a bit more before adding Apache commons? > > How about if we hold off for 3-4 days, and if we haven't hit >150ish > sources by then, we can add them? > > > > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > >> On 12/03/2017 12:25 PM, Rafael Weingärtner wrote: > >>> Gilles, I actually do not know the reason behind this limit on data > >>> sources. I am fairly new to kibble project. Let´s see what Daniel or > >> others > >>> have to say about this limit. > >> > >> The limit is somewhat arbitrary, but we would favor smaller projects > >> over behemoths like Commons at the moment. We're trying to, at one hand, > >> figure out how many sources we can cram into the single demo box we have > >> at our disposal, while also trying to get as many projects involved as > >> possible. I know from elsewhere that we would need something like 5-6 > >> times the resources we currently have, if we were to put the entire ASF > >> into the Kibble demo, and we don't currently have a budget for that. > >> > >> Now, the entire ASF would be around 7,500 source objects, so 100 is a > >> very low limit, granted. If the Commons project has an actual interest > >> in using Kibble for reports and what not, we can get them added - the > >> thing to remember here is merely that we'd favor getting as much bang > >> for our buck as possible. > >> > >> I did some quick checks of available resources, and we're not using a > >> whole bunch yet, so we can probably aim for 200 source objects for now, > >> and still be fine. > >> > >> With regards, > >> Daniel. > >> > >>> > >>> On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 10:30 PM, Gilles Sadowski <er...@apache.org> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi. > >>>> > >>>> On 2017-12-02 21:27, Rafael Weingärtner <rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> How should I handle adding apache commons? > >>>>> > >>>>> If I add all of the sources we will go over the limit of 100 sources. > >> In > >>>>> Github there are 72 projects, and on Jira there other 70+ projects. > >>>> > >>>> A lot of projects, yes; but most of them are quite small, and many > >>>> have very low activity. > >>>> Would that mitigate usage resources? > >>>> If the number above is a hard limit, I'll ask the ML for a priority > >> list... > >>>> > >>>>> At > >>>>> least the mailing list seems to be only the ones found here: > >>>>> https://lists.apache.org/list.html?u...@commons.apache.org > >>>> > >>>> The "dev" ML should rather be selected. > >>>> > >>>> Gilles > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Gilles Sadowski <er...@apache.org> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Hello. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 2017-11-27 19:26, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> wrote: > >>>>>>> [...] > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> PS: Please note, we have limited capacity for these tests. We > cannot > >>>>>>> have every single ASF project in the demo, and we reserve the > rights > >>>> to > >>>>>>> pick the projects that can participate, should we get a lot of > >>>> requests. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Would you consider adding the "Commons"[1] projects? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>> Gilles > >>>>>> > >>>>>> [1] http://commons.apache.org/ > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Rafael Weingärtner > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > > > > > > -- Rafael Weingärtner
