On 12/19/2017 01:09 PM, Rafael Weingärtner wrote: > Some time has gone by and other projects were not added. > So, should we add Apache commons?
sgtm > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Rafael Weingärtner < > rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> ok, I will do that. >> >> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> On 12/04/2017 12:41 PM, Rafael Weingärtner wrote: >>>> So, should we wait a bit more before adding Apache commons? >>> >>> How about if we hold off for 3-4 days, and if we haven't hit >150ish >>> sources by then, we can add them? >>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 12/03/2017 12:25 PM, Rafael Weingärtner wrote: >>>>>> Gilles, I actually do not know the reason behind this limit on data >>>>>> sources. I am fairly new to kibble project. Let´s see what Daniel or >>>>> others >>>>>> have to say about this limit. >>>>> >>>>> The limit is somewhat arbitrary, but we would favor smaller projects >>>>> over behemoths like Commons at the moment. We're trying to, at one >>> hand, >>>>> figure out how many sources we can cram into the single demo box we >>> have >>>>> at our disposal, while also trying to get as many projects involved as >>>>> possible. I know from elsewhere that we would need something like 5-6 >>>>> times the resources we currently have, if we were to put the entire ASF >>>>> into the Kibble demo, and we don't currently have a budget for that. >>>>> >>>>> Now, the entire ASF would be around 7,500 source objects, so 100 is a >>>>> very low limit, granted. If the Commons project has an actual interest >>>>> in using Kibble for reports and what not, we can get them added - the >>>>> thing to remember here is merely that we'd favor getting as much bang >>>>> for our buck as possible. >>>>> >>>>> I did some quick checks of available resources, and we're not using a >>>>> whole bunch yet, so we can probably aim for 200 source objects for now, >>>>> and still be fine. >>>>> >>>>> With regards, >>>>> Daniel. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 10:30 PM, Gilles Sadowski <er...@apache.org> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2017-12-02 21:27, Rafael Weingärtner <rafaelweingart...@gmail.com >>>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> How should I handle adding apache commons? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If I add all of the sources we will go over the limit of 100 >>> sources. >>>>> In >>>>>>>> Github there are 72 projects, and on Jira there other 70+ projects. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> A lot of projects, yes; but most of them are quite small, and many >>>>>>> have very low activity. >>>>>>> Would that mitigate usage resources? >>>>>>> If the number above is a hard limit, I'll ask the ML for a priority >>>>> list... >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> At >>>>>>>> least the mailing list seems to be only the ones found here: >>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/list.html?u...@commons.apache.org >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The "dev" ML should rather be selected. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Gilles >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Gilles Sadowski <er...@apache.org> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hello. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 2017-11-27 19:26, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> [...] >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> PS: Please note, we have limited capacity for these tests. We >>> cannot >>>>>>>>>> have every single ASF project in the demo, and we reserve the >>> rights >>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>> pick the projects that can participate, should we get a lot of >>>>>>> requests. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Would you consider adding the "Commons"[1] projects? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>> Gilles >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [1] http://commons.apache.org/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Rafael Weingärtner >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Rafael Weingärtner >> > > >
