Some time has gone by and other projects were not added. So, should we add Apache commons?
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Rafael Weingärtner < rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote: > ok, I will do that. > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> wrote: > >> On 12/04/2017 12:41 PM, Rafael Weingärtner wrote: >> > So, should we wait a bit more before adding Apache commons? >> >> How about if we hold off for 3-4 days, and if we haven't hit >150ish >> sources by then, we can add them? >> >> > >> > On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> > >> >> On 12/03/2017 12:25 PM, Rafael Weingärtner wrote: >> >>> Gilles, I actually do not know the reason behind this limit on data >> >>> sources. I am fairly new to kibble project. Let´s see what Daniel or >> >> others >> >>> have to say about this limit. >> >> >> >> The limit is somewhat arbitrary, but we would favor smaller projects >> >> over behemoths like Commons at the moment. We're trying to, at one >> hand, >> >> figure out how many sources we can cram into the single demo box we >> have >> >> at our disposal, while also trying to get as many projects involved as >> >> possible. I know from elsewhere that we would need something like 5-6 >> >> times the resources we currently have, if we were to put the entire ASF >> >> into the Kibble demo, and we don't currently have a budget for that. >> >> >> >> Now, the entire ASF would be around 7,500 source objects, so 100 is a >> >> very low limit, granted. If the Commons project has an actual interest >> >> in using Kibble for reports and what not, we can get them added - the >> >> thing to remember here is merely that we'd favor getting as much bang >> >> for our buck as possible. >> >> >> >> I did some quick checks of available resources, and we're not using a >> >> whole bunch yet, so we can probably aim for 200 source objects for now, >> >> and still be fine. >> >> >> >> With regards, >> >> Daniel. >> >> >> >>> >> >>> On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 10:30 PM, Gilles Sadowski <er...@apache.org> >> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> Hi. >> >>>> >> >>>> On 2017-12-02 21:27, Rafael Weingärtner <rafaelweingart...@gmail.com >> > >> >>>> wrote: >> >>>>> How should I handle adding apache commons? >> >>>>> >> >>>>> If I add all of the sources we will go over the limit of 100 >> sources. >> >> In >> >>>>> Github there are 72 projects, and on Jira there other 70+ projects. >> >>>> >> >>>> A lot of projects, yes; but most of them are quite small, and many >> >>>> have very low activity. >> >>>> Would that mitigate usage resources? >> >>>> If the number above is a hard limit, I'll ask the ML for a priority >> >> list... >> >>>> >> >>>>> At >> >>>>> least the mailing list seems to be only the ones found here: >> >>>>> https://lists.apache.org/list.html?u...@commons.apache.org >> >>>> >> >>>> The "dev" ML should rather be selected. >> >>>> >> >>>> Gilles >> >>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Gilles Sadowski <er...@apache.org> >> >>>> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>>> Hello. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> On 2017-11-27 19:26, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>>>>>> [...] >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> PS: Please note, we have limited capacity for these tests. We >> cannot >> >>>>>>> have every single ASF project in the demo, and we reserve the >> rights >> >>>> to >> >>>>>>> pick the projects that can participate, should we get a lot of >> >>>> requests. >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Would you consider adding the "Commons"[1] projects? >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Regards, >> >>>>>> Gilles >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> [1] http://commons.apache.org/ >> >>>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> -- >> >>>>> Rafael Weingärtner >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> >> > > > -- > Rafael Weingärtner > -- Rafael Weingärtner
