On 12/04/2017 12:41 PM, Rafael Weingärtner wrote: > So, should we wait a bit more before adding Apache commons?
How about if we hold off for 3-4 days, and if we haven't hit >150ish sources by then, we can add them? > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> wrote: > >> On 12/03/2017 12:25 PM, Rafael Weingärtner wrote: >>> Gilles, I actually do not know the reason behind this limit on data >>> sources. I am fairly new to kibble project. Let´s see what Daniel or >> others >>> have to say about this limit. >> >> The limit is somewhat arbitrary, but we would favor smaller projects >> over behemoths like Commons at the moment. We're trying to, at one hand, >> figure out how many sources we can cram into the single demo box we have >> at our disposal, while also trying to get as many projects involved as >> possible. I know from elsewhere that we would need something like 5-6 >> times the resources we currently have, if we were to put the entire ASF >> into the Kibble demo, and we don't currently have a budget for that. >> >> Now, the entire ASF would be around 7,500 source objects, so 100 is a >> very low limit, granted. If the Commons project has an actual interest >> in using Kibble for reports and what not, we can get them added - the >> thing to remember here is merely that we'd favor getting as much bang >> for our buck as possible. >> >> I did some quick checks of available resources, and we're not using a >> whole bunch yet, so we can probably aim for 200 source objects for now, >> and still be fine. >> >> With regards, >> Daniel. >> >>> >>> On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 10:30 PM, Gilles Sadowski <er...@apache.org> >> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi. >>>> >>>> On 2017-12-02 21:27, Rafael Weingärtner <rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> How should I handle adding apache commons? >>>>> >>>>> If I add all of the sources we will go over the limit of 100 sources. >> In >>>>> Github there are 72 projects, and on Jira there other 70+ projects. >>>> >>>> A lot of projects, yes; but most of them are quite small, and many >>>> have very low activity. >>>> Would that mitigate usage resources? >>>> If the number above is a hard limit, I'll ask the ML for a priority >> list... >>>> >>>>> At >>>>> least the mailing list seems to be only the ones found here: >>>>> https://lists.apache.org/list.html?u...@commons.apache.org >>>> >>>> The "dev" ML should rather be selected. >>>> >>>> Gilles >>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Gilles Sadowski <er...@apache.org> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hello. >>>>>> >>>>>> On 2017-11-27 19:26, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>>>> [...] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> PS: Please note, we have limited capacity for these tests. We cannot >>>>>>> have every single ASF project in the demo, and we reserve the rights >>>> to >>>>>>> pick the projects that can participate, should we get a lot of >>>> requests. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Would you consider adding the "Commons"[1] projects? >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Gilles >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] http://commons.apache.org/ >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Rafael Weingärtner >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > >
