Nick, I see Mike has committed a fix for LUCENE-7158 to the 6.0 branch after your RC was cut, and the issue is marked as fixed in 6.0. Does that mean you will be creating another RC? I’m going to hold off testing RC1 until you address this.
-- Steve www.lucidworks.com > On Apr 1, 2016, at 11:43 AM, Nicholas Knize <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks for the notice on the broken link Jack! I guess that's what I get for > copying an old link to gmail and changing the artifact directory text. These > should be the correct links: > > Artifacts: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC1-revb5f04a67fbb7422cb8f5c91a28b2c8e7eff5e12a > > Smoke tester: > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC1-revb5f04a67fbb7422cb8f5c91a28b2c8e7eff5e12a > > - Nick Knize > > On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 10:11 AM, Jack Krupansky <[email protected]> > wrote: > I haven't been participating in to testing or voting for Lucene/Solr releases > lately, but I was just going to peek at the artifacts since I noticed that > these URLs are for the underlying Apache git repo, not the public github. I > don't see an equivalent branch on the public github. Maybe that makes sense > since the artifacts are not source code. In any case, if I click on the > artifact link in the email I get a 404, which references the 5.5 release, not > 6.0. The link says 6.0, but the underlying URL is for 5.5! In any case, this > appears to be the proper URL: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC1-revb5f04a67fbb7422cb8f5c91a28b2c8e7eff5e12a/ > > The smoketester link has the same issue, but won't be a problem if people > just copy the literal text from the email since that will not include the > underlying link URL which says 5.5. > > In any case, I will be a -0 (nonbinding) on this release due to my > unhappiness about how points/numerics, including migration, is being handled. > That's not intended to reflect negatively on the RM or the logistical aspects > of the release process. I certainly won't attempt to stand in the way of > getting 6.0 out ASAP. > > > -- Jack Krupansky > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 5:42 PM, Nicholas Knize <[email protected]> wrote: > Please vote for the RC1 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 6.0.0. > > Artifacts: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC1-revb5f04a67fbb7422cb8f5c91a28b2c8e7eff5e12a > > Smoke tester: > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC1-revb5f04a67fbb7422cb8f5c91a28b2c8e7eff5e12a > > Here's my +1: > > SUCCESS! [0:31:26.186710] > > - Nick Knize > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
