Sorry, and thanks Nick! Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 1:09 PM, Nicholas Knize <[email protected]> wrote: > This VOTE is now cancelled: I'm going to respin (to RC2) to fold in > LUCENE-7158 and avoid carrying this bug through 6.0. > > - Nick Knize > > On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Nicholas Knize <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Thanks Steve! I agree LUCENE-7158 is a bug that should be included now. >> Otherwise we're stuck carrying this constant until 7.0. >> >> On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Nick, I see Mike has committed a fix for LUCENE-7158 to the 6.0 branch >>> after your RC was cut, and the issue is marked as fixed in 6.0. Does that >>> mean you will be creating another RC? I’m going to hold off testing RC1 >>> until you address this. >>> >>> -- >>> Steve >>> www.lucidworks.com >>> >>> > On Apr 1, 2016, at 11:43 AM, Nicholas Knize <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > Thanks for the notice on the broken link Jack! I guess that's what I >>> > get for copying an old link to gmail and changing the artifact directory >>> > text. These should be the correct links: >>> > >>> > Artifacts: >>> > >>> > >>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC1-revb5f04a67fbb7422cb8f5c91a28b2c8e7eff5e12a >>> > >>> > Smoke tester: >>> > >>> > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py >>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC1-revb5f04a67fbb7422cb8f5c91a28b2c8e7eff5e12a >>> > >>> > - Nick Knize >>> > >>> > On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 10:11 AM, Jack Krupansky >>> > <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > I haven't been participating in to testing or voting for Lucene/Solr >>> > releases lately, but I was just going to peek at the artifacts since I >>> > noticed that these URLs are for the underlying Apache git repo, not the >>> > public github. I don't see an equivalent branch on the public github. >>> > Maybe >>> > that makes sense since the artifacts are not source code. In any case, if >>> > I >>> > click on the artifact link in the email I get a 404, which references the >>> > 5.5 release, not 6.0. The link says 6.0, but the underlying URL is for >>> > 5.5! >>> > In any case, this appears to be the proper URL: >>> > >>> > >>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC1-revb5f04a67fbb7422cb8f5c91a28b2c8e7eff5e12a/ >>> > >>> > The smoketester link has the same issue, but won't be a problem if >>> > people just copy the literal text from the email since that will not >>> > include >>> > the underlying link URL which says 5.5. >>> > >>> > In any case, I will be a -0 (nonbinding) on this release due to my >>> > unhappiness about how points/numerics, including migration, is being >>> > handled. That's not intended to reflect negatively on the RM or the >>> > logistical aspects of the release process. I certainly won't attempt to >>> > stand in the way of getting 6.0 out ASAP. >>> > >>> > >>> > -- Jack Krupansky >>> > >>> > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 5:42 PM, Nicholas Knize <[email protected]> >>> > wrote: >>> > Please vote for the RC1 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 6.0.0. >>> > >>> > Artifacts: >>> > >>> > >>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC1-revb5f04a67fbb7422cb8f5c91a28b2c8e7eff5e12a >>> > >>> > Smoke tester: >>> > >>> > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py >>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC1-revb5f04a67fbb7422cb8f5c91a28b2c8e7eff5e12a >>> > >>> > Here's my +1: >>> > >>> > SUCCESS! [0:31:26.186710] >>> > >>> > - Nick Knize >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
