Thanks Steve! I agree LUCENE-7158 is a bug that should be included now. Otherwise we're stuck carrying this constant until 7.0.
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote: > Nick, I see Mike has committed a fix for LUCENE-7158 to the 6.0 branch > after your RC was cut, and the issue is marked as fixed in 6.0. Does that > mean you will be creating another RC? I’m going to hold off testing RC1 > until you address this. > > -- > Steve > www.lucidworks.com > > > On Apr 1, 2016, at 11:43 AM, Nicholas Knize <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Thanks for the notice on the broken link Jack! I guess that's what I get > for copying an old link to gmail and changing the artifact directory text. > These should be the correct links: > > > > Artifacts: > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC1-revb5f04a67fbb7422cb8f5c91a28b2c8e7eff5e12a > > > > Smoke tester: > > > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC1-revb5f04a67fbb7422cb8f5c91a28b2c8e7eff5e12a > > > > - Nick Knize > > > > On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 10:11 AM, Jack Krupansky < > [email protected]> wrote: > > I haven't been participating in to testing or voting for Lucene/Solr > releases lately, but I was just going to peek at the artifacts since I > noticed that these URLs are for the underlying Apache git repo, not the > public github. I don't see an equivalent branch on the public github. Maybe > that makes sense since the artifacts are not source code. In any case, if I > click on the artifact link in the email I get a 404, which references the > 5.5 release, not 6.0. The link says 6.0, but the underlying URL is for 5.5! > In any case, this appears to be the proper URL: > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC1-revb5f04a67fbb7422cb8f5c91a28b2c8e7eff5e12a/ > > > > The smoketester link has the same issue, but won't be a problem if > people just copy the literal text from the email since that will not > include the underlying link URL which says 5.5. > > > > In any case, I will be a -0 (nonbinding) on this release due to my > unhappiness about how points/numerics, including migration, is being > handled. That's not intended to reflect negatively on the RM or the > logistical aspects of the release process. I certainly won't attempt to > stand in the way of getting 6.0 out ASAP. > > > > > > -- Jack Krupansky > > > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 5:42 PM, Nicholas Knize <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Please vote for the RC1 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 6.0.0. > > > > Artifacts: > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC1-revb5f04a67fbb7422cb8f5c91a28b2c8e7eff5e12a > > > > Smoke tester: > > > > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC1-revb5f04a67fbb7422cb8f5c91a28b2c8e7eff5e12a > > > > Here's my +1: > > > > SUCCESS! [0:31:26.186710] > > > > - Nick Knize > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
