Nick:

Sure. Here's my current take. When it's done, I'll put it on the
trunk, 6x and 6.0. Then it'll be picked up on whatever the next
release, be it 6.0, 6.0.1 or even 6.1. It doesn't merit a respin on
its own IMO...

Thanks!
Erick

On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 9:06 PM, Nicholas Knize <nkn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Erick. The RC2 respin was already done and the vote is currently open. We
> can revisit if, for some reason, I need to spin RC3?
>
>
> On Friday, April 1, 2016, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I'd like to get SOLR-8812 resolved, but since the problem is also in
>> 5.5 it's one of those cases where if I can get it resolved without
>> rushing for 6.0 I will, otherwise for 6.0.1 or 6.1 or whatever.
>>
>> Nick: Let's assume that a patch (actually, there is one but I haven't
>> looked at it and won't be able to until next week) gets through the
>> process before you re-spin 6.0. Any objections to including it?
>>
>> And "let me be clear"... if other issues get resolved and 6.0 is
>> re-spun before this gets resolved, as far as I'm concerned we'll just
>> resolve it later....
>>
>> Erick
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Michael McCandless
>> <luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>> > Sorry, and thanks Nick!
>> >
>> > Mike McCandless
>> >
>> > http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 1:09 PM, Nicholas Knize <nkn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> This VOTE is now cancelled: I'm going to respin (to RC2) to fold in
>> >> LUCENE-7158 and avoid carrying this bug through 6.0.
>> >>
>> >> - Nick Knize
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Nicholas Knize <nkn...@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks Steve! I agree LUCENE-7158 is a bug that should be included
>> >>> now.
>> >>> Otherwise we're stuck carrying this constant until 7.0.
>> >>>
>> >>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Nick, I see Mike has committed a fix for LUCENE-7158 to the 6.0
>> >>>> branch
>> >>>> after your RC was cut, and the issue is marked as fixed in 6.0.  Does
>> >>>> that
>> >>>> mean you will be creating another RC?  I’m going to hold off testing
>> >>>> RC1
>> >>>> until you address this.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> --
>> >>>> Steve
>> >>>> www.lucidworks.com
>> >>>>
>> >>>> > On Apr 1, 2016, at 11:43 AM, Nicholas Knize <nkn...@gmail.com>
>> >>>> > wrote:
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > Thanks for the notice on the broken link Jack! I guess that's what
>> >>>> > I
>> >>>> > get for copying an old link to gmail and changing the artifact
>> >>>> > directory
>> >>>> > text.  These should be the correct links:
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > Artifacts:
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC1-revb5f04a67fbb7422cb8f5c91a28b2c8e7eff5e12a
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > Smoke tester:
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >   python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC1-revb5f04a67fbb7422cb8f5c91a28b2c8e7eff5e12a
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > - Nick Knize
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 10:11 AM, Jack Krupansky
>> >>>> > <jack.krupan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>> > I haven't been participating in to testing or voting for
>> >>>> > Lucene/Solr
>> >>>> > releases lately, but I was just going to peek at the artifacts
>> >>>> > since I
>> >>>> > noticed that these URLs are for the underlying Apache git repo, not
>> >>>> > the
>> >>>> > public github. I don't see an equivalent branch on the public
>> >>>> > github. Maybe
>> >>>> > that makes sense since the artifacts are not source code. In any
>> >>>> > case, if I
>> >>>> > click on the artifact link in the email I get a 404, which
>> >>>> > references the
>> >>>> > 5.5 release, not 6.0. The link says 6.0, but the underlying URL is
>> >>>> > for 5.5!
>> >>>> > In any case, this appears to be the proper URL:
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC1-revb5f04a67fbb7422cb8f5c91a28b2c8e7eff5e12a/
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > The smoketester link has the same issue, but won't be a problem if
>> >>>> > people just copy the literal text from the email since that will
>> >>>> > not include
>> >>>> > the underlying link URL which says 5.5.
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > In any case, I will be a -0 (nonbinding) on this release due to my
>> >>>> > unhappiness about how points/numerics, including migration, is
>> >>>> > being
>> >>>> > handled. That's not intended to reflect negatively on the RM or the
>> >>>> > logistical aspects of the release process. I certainly won't
>> >>>> > attempt to
>> >>>> > stand in the way of getting 6.0 out ASAP.
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > -- Jack Krupansky
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 5:42 PM, Nicholas Knize <nkn...@gmail.com>
>> >>>> > wrote:
>> >>>> > Please vote for the RC1 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 6.0.0.
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > Artifacts:
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC1-revb5f04a67fbb7422cb8f5c91a28b2c8e7eff5e12a
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > Smoke tester:
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >   python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC1-revb5f04a67fbb7422cb8f5c91a28b2c8e7eff5e12a
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > Here's my +1:
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > SUCCESS! [0:31:26.186710]
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> > - Nick Knize
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to