This VOTE is now cancelled: I'm going to respin (to RC2) to fold in LUCENE-7158 and avoid carrying this bug through 6.0.
- Nick Knize On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Nicholas Knize <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Steve! I agree LUCENE-7158 is a bug that should be included now. > Otherwise we're stuck carrying this constant until 7.0. > > On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Nick, I see Mike has committed a fix for LUCENE-7158 to the 6.0 branch >> after your RC was cut, and the issue is marked as fixed in 6.0. Does that >> mean you will be creating another RC? I’m going to hold off testing RC1 >> until you address this. >> >> -- >> Steve >> www.lucidworks.com >> >> > On Apr 1, 2016, at 11:43 AM, Nicholas Knize <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Thanks for the notice on the broken link Jack! I guess that's what I >> get for copying an old link to gmail and changing the artifact directory >> text. These should be the correct links: >> > >> > Artifacts: >> > >> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC1-revb5f04a67fbb7422cb8f5c91a28b2c8e7eff5e12a >> > >> > Smoke tester: >> > >> > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC1-revb5f04a67fbb7422cb8f5c91a28b2c8e7eff5e12a >> > >> > - Nick Knize >> > >> > On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 10:11 AM, Jack Krupansky < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> > I haven't been participating in to testing or voting for Lucene/Solr >> releases lately, but I was just going to peek at the artifacts since I >> noticed that these URLs are for the underlying Apache git repo, not the >> public github. I don't see an equivalent branch on the public github. Maybe >> that makes sense since the artifacts are not source code. In any case, if I >> click on the artifact link in the email I get a 404, which references the >> 5.5 release, not 6.0. The link says 6.0, but the underlying URL is for 5.5! >> In any case, this appears to be the proper URL: >> > >> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC1-revb5f04a67fbb7422cb8f5c91a28b2c8e7eff5e12a/ >> > >> > The smoketester link has the same issue, but won't be a problem if >> people just copy the literal text from the email since that will not >> include the underlying link URL which says 5.5. >> > >> > In any case, I will be a -0 (nonbinding) on this release due to my >> unhappiness about how points/numerics, including migration, is being >> handled. That's not intended to reflect negatively on the RM or the >> logistical aspects of the release process. I certainly won't attempt to >> stand in the way of getting 6.0 out ASAP. >> > >> > >> > -- Jack Krupansky >> > >> > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 5:42 PM, Nicholas Knize <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Please vote for the RC1 release candidate for Lucene/Solr 6.0.0. >> > >> > Artifacts: >> > >> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC1-revb5f04a67fbb7422cb8f5c91a28b2c8e7eff5e12a >> > >> > Smoke tester: >> > >> > python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-6.0.0-RC1-revb5f04a67fbb7422cb8f5c91a28b2c8e7eff5e12a >> > >> > Here's my +1: >> > >> > SUCCESS! [0:31:26.186710] >> > >> > - Nick Knize >> > >> > >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> >
