On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[email protected]> wrote: > On Apr 6, 2011, at 12:06 PM, Smiley, David W. wrote: >> with its replacement being an externally hosted ASL-licened module expressly >> designed to work with Lucene/Solr 4.0 and beyond (temporarily known as >> lucene-spatial-playground). What would stay is the _basic_ spatial support >> that got into Lucene/Solr 3.1. Furthermore, no future spatial work would be >> accepted on Lucene/Solr aside from support of the basic capability. > > That is the piece I was wondering about and why I said yesterday it isn't > likely to work, as it will just fork. How do you tell people not to put in > patches to L/S, especially when part of it is native and part of it isn't?
Right - there's no need to try and make promises about the future. It seems unrelated to the questions at hand here. -Yonik http://www.lucenerevolution.org -- Lucene/Solr User Conference, May 25-26, San Francisco --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
