On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Grant Ingersoll <grant.ingers...@gmail.com> wrote: > By all means go for it. I don't see any reason not too. I guess in the end, > I'm not sure what you are asking us to do. Do you want Lucene/Solr to remove > all of our spatial support in favor of incorporating this new project or do > you just want those who are interested in spatial to join the new project and > it can be seen as an add on?
Let's not confuse the issue... what is being discussed really has no impact on the basic spatial search that was added to Solr. As you said yourself, the Solr geo stuff uses very little of the spatial contrib stuff. This is about building and maintaining a spatial module, and the best place to do it (which I'll leave up to those doing the work... I'm pretty happy with basic point, radius, bounding-box). -Yonik http://www.lucenerevolution.org -- Lucene/Solr User Conference, May 25-26, San Francisco --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
