SOLR-11458 is committed and resolved - thanks for the patience.
> On 6 Dec 2017, at 14:02, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks for the heads up, Anshum. > > This leaves us with only SOLR-11458 to wait for before building a RC (which > might be ready but just not marked as resolved). > > > Le mer. 6 déc. 2017 à 13:47, Ishan Chattopadhyaya <ichattopadhy...@gmail.com > <mailto:ichattopadhy...@gmail.com>> a écrit : > Hi Adrien, > I'm planning to skip SOLR-11624 for this release (as per my last comment > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11624?focusedCommentId=16280121&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-16280121 > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11624?focusedCommentId=16280121&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-16280121>). > If someone has an objection, please let me know; otherwise, please feel free > to proceed with the release. > I'll continue working on it anyway, and shall try to have it ready for the > next release. > Thanks, > Ishan > > On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com > <mailto:jpou...@gmail.com>> wrote: > FYI I created the new branch for 7.2, so you will have to backport to this > branch. No hurry though, I mostly created the branch so that it's fine to > cherry-pick changes that may wait for 7.3 to be released. > > Le mer. 6 déc. 2017 à 08:53, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com > <mailto:jpou...@gmail.com>> a écrit : > Sorry to hear that Ishan, I hope you are doing better now. +1 to get > SOLR-11624 in. > > Le mer. 6 déc. 2017 à 07:57, Ishan Chattopadhyaya <ichattopadhy...@gmail.com > <mailto:ichattopadhy...@gmail.com>> a écrit : > I was a bit unwell over the weekend and yesterday; I'm working on a very > targeted fix for SOLR-11624 right now; I expect it to take another 5-6 hours. > Is that fine with you, Adrien? If not, please go ahead with the release, and > I'll volunteer later for a bugfix release for this after 7.2 is out. > > On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 3:25 AM, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com > <mailto:jpou...@gmail.com>> wrote: > Fine with me. > > > Le mar. 5 déc. 2017 à 22:34, Varun Thacker <va...@vthacker.in > <mailto:va...@vthacker.in>> a écrit : > Hi Adrien, > > I'd like to commit SOLR-11590 . The issue had a patch couple of weeks ago and > has been reviewed but never got committed. I've run all the tests twice as > well to verify. > > On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Andrzej Białecki > <andrzej.biale...@lucidworks.com <mailto:andrzej.biale...@lucidworks.com>> > wrote: > >> On 5 Dec 2017, at 18:05, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com >> <mailto:jpou...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> Andrzej, ok to merge since it is a bug fix. Since we're close to the RC >> build, maybe try to get someone familiar with the code to review it to make >> sure it doesn't have unexpected side-effects? > > Sure I’ll do this - thanks! > >> >> Le mar. 5 déc. 2017 à 17:57, Andrzej Białecki >> <andrzej.biale...@lucidworks.com <mailto:andrzej.biale...@lucidworks.com>> a >> écrit : >> Adrien, >> >> If it’s ok I would also like to merge SOLR-11458, this significantly reduces >> the chance of accidental data loss when using MoveReplicaCmd. >> >>> On 5 Dec 2017, at 14:44, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com >>> <mailto:jpou...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> Quick update: >>> >>> LUCENE-8043, SOLR-9137, SOLR-11662 and SOLR-11687 have been merged, they >>> will be in 7.2. >>> >>> LUCENE-8048 and SOLR-11624 are still open. >>> >>> LUCENE-8048 looks like it could make things better in some cases but I >>> don't think it is required for 7.2, so I don't plan to hold the release on >>> it. >>> >>> SOLR-11624 looks bad, I'll wait for it. >>> >>> Le mar. 5 déc. 2017 à 07:45, Noble Paul <noble.p...@gmail.com >>> <mailto:noble.p...@gmail.com>> a écrit : >>> +1 this is over due >>> >>> On Dec 4, 2017 16:38, "Varun Thacker" <va...@vthacker.in >>> <mailto:va...@vthacker.in>> wrote: >>> +1 Adrien ! Thanks for taking it up >>> >>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ QUEEN VIC) >>> <cpoersc...@bloomberg.net <mailto:cpoersc...@bloomberg.net>> wrote: >>> I'd like to see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9137 >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9137> included in the release. >>> Hoping to commit it on/by Tuesday. >>> >>> Christine >>> >>> From: dev@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev@lucene.apache.org> At: 12/01/17 >>> 10:11:59 >>> To: dev@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev@lucene.apache.org> >>> Subject: Lucene/Solr 7.2 >>> Hello, >>> >>> It's been more than 6 weeks since we released 7.1 and we accumulated a good >>> set of changes, so I think we should release Lucene/Solr 7.2.0. >>> >>> There is one change that I would like to have before building a RC: >>> LUCENE-8043[1], which looks like it is almost ready to be merged. Please >>> let me know if there are any other changes that should make it to the >>> release. >>> >>> I volunteer to be the release manager. I'm currently thinking of building >>> the first release candidate next wednesday, December 6th. >>> >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8043 >>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8043> >>> >> > > > >
