FYI I created the new branch for 7.2, so you will have to backport to this branch. No hurry though, I mostly created the branch so that it's fine to cherry-pick changes that may wait for 7.3 to be released.
Le mer. 6 déc. 2017 à 08:53, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> a écrit : > Sorry to hear that Ishan, I hope you are doing better now. +1 to get > SOLR-11624 in. > > Le mer. 6 déc. 2017 à 07:57, Ishan Chattopadhyaya < > ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> a écrit : > >> I was a bit unwell over the weekend and yesterday; I'm working on a very >> targeted fix for SOLR-11624 right now; I expect it to take another 5-6 >> hours. >> Is that fine with you, Adrien? If not, please go ahead with the release, >> and I'll volunteer later for a bugfix release for this after 7.2 is out. >> >> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 3:25 AM, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Fine with me. >>> >>> Le mar. 5 déc. 2017 à 22:34, Varun Thacker <va...@vthacker.in> a écrit : >>> >>>> Hi Adrien, >>>> >>>> I'd like to commit SOLR-11590 . The issue had a patch couple of weeks >>>> ago and has been reviewed but never got committed. I've run all the tests >>>> twice as well to verify. >>>> >>>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Andrzej Białecki < >>>> andrzej.biale...@lucidworks.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 5 Dec 2017, at 18:05, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Andrzej, ok to merge since it is a bug fix. Since we're close to the >>>>> RC build, maybe try to get someone familiar with the code to review it to >>>>> make sure it doesn't have unexpected side-effects? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Sure I’ll do this - thanks! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Le mar. 5 déc. 2017 à 17:57, Andrzej Białecki < >>>>> andrzej.biale...@lucidworks.com> a écrit : >>>>> >>>>>> Adrien, >>>>>> >>>>>> If it’s ok I would also like to merge SOLR-11458, this significantly >>>>>> reduces the chance of accidental data loss when using MoveReplicaCmd. >>>>>> >>>>>> On 5 Dec 2017, at 14:44, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Quick update: >>>>>> >>>>>> LUCENE-8043, SOLR-9137, SOLR-11662 and SOLR-11687 have been merged, >>>>>> they will be in 7.2. >>>>>> >>>>>> LUCENE-8048 and SOLR-11624 are still open. >>>>>> >>>>>> LUCENE-8048 looks like it could make things better in some cases but >>>>>> I don't think it is required for 7.2, so I don't plan to hold the release >>>>>> on it. >>>>>> >>>>>> SOLR-11624 looks bad, I'll wait for it. >>>>>> >>>>>> Le mar. 5 déc. 2017 à 07:45, Noble Paul <noble.p...@gmail.com> a >>>>>> écrit : >>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 this is over due >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Dec 4, 2017 16:38, "Varun Thacker" <va...@vthacker.in> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> +1 Adrien ! Thanks for taking it up >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ >>>>>>> QUEEN VIC) <cpoersc...@bloomberg.net> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I'd like to see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9137 >>>>>>>> included in the release. Hoping to commit it on/by Tuesday. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Christine >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: 12/01/17 10:11:59 >>>>>>>> To: dev@lucene.apache.org >>>>>>>> Subject: Lucene/Solr 7.2 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hello, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It's been more than 6 weeks since we released 7.1 and we >>>>>>>> accumulated a good set of changes, so I think we should release >>>>>>>> Lucene/Solr >>>>>>>> 7.2.0. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There is one change that I would like to have before building a RC: >>>>>>>> LUCENE-8043[1], which looks like it is almost ready to be merged. >>>>>>>> Please >>>>>>>> let me know if there are any other changes that should make it to the >>>>>>>> release. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I volunteer to be the release manager. I'm currently thinking of >>>>>>>> building the first release candidate next wednesday, December 6th. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8043 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>
