I attached the patch to SOLR-11714, which disables the ‘searchRate’ trigger - 
if there are no objections I’ll commit it shortly to branch_7.2.

> On 6 Dec 2017, at 15:51, Andrzej Białecki <andrzej.biale...@lucidworks.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 6 Dec 2017, at 15:35, Andrzej Białecki <andrzej.biale...@lucidworks.com 
>> <mailto:andrzej.biale...@lucidworks.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> SOLR-11458 is committed and resolved - thanks for the patience.
> 
> 
> Actually, one more thing … ;) SOLR-11714 is a more serious bug in a new 
> feature (searchRate autoscaling trigger). It’s probably best to disable this 
> feature in 7.2 rather than releasing a broken version, so I’d like to commit 
> a patch that disables it (plus a note in CHANGES.txt).
> 
> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 6 Dec 2017, at 14:02, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com 
>>> <mailto:jpou...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Thanks for the heads up, Anshum.
>>> 
>>> This leaves us with only SOLR-11458 to wait for before building a RC (which 
>>> might be ready but just not marked as resolved).
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Le mer. 6 déc. 2017 à 13:47, Ishan Chattopadhyaya 
>>> <ichattopadhy...@gmail.com <mailto:ichattopadhy...@gmail.com>> a écrit :
>>> Hi Adrien,
>>> I'm planning to skip SOLR-11624 for this release (as per my last comment 
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11624?focusedCommentId=16280121&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-16280121
>>>  
>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11624?focusedCommentId=16280121&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-16280121>).
>>>  If someone has an objection, please let me know; otherwise, please feel 
>>> free to proceed with the release.
>>> I'll continue working on it anyway, and shall try to have it ready for the 
>>> next release.
>>> Thanks,
>>> Ishan
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com 
>>> <mailto:jpou...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> FYI I created the new branch for 7.2, so you will have to backport to this 
>>> branch. No hurry though, I mostly created the branch so that it's fine to 
>>> cherry-pick changes that may wait for 7.3 to be released.
>>> 
>>> Le mer. 6 déc. 2017 à 08:53, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com 
>>> <mailto:jpou...@gmail.com>> a écrit :
>>> Sorry to hear that Ishan, I hope you are doing better now. +1 to get 
>>> SOLR-11624 in.
>>> 
>>> Le mer. 6 déc. 2017 à 07:57, Ishan Chattopadhyaya 
>>> <ichattopadhy...@gmail.com <mailto:ichattopadhy...@gmail.com>> a écrit :
>>> I was a bit unwell over the weekend and yesterday; I'm working on a very 
>>> targeted fix for SOLR-11624 right now; I expect it to take another 5-6 
>>> hours.
>>> Is that fine with you, Adrien? If not, please go ahead with the release, 
>>> and I'll volunteer later for a bugfix release for this after 7.2 is out.
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Dec 6, 2017 at 3:25 AM, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com 
>>> <mailto:jpou...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> Fine with me.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Le mar. 5 déc. 2017 à 22:34, Varun Thacker <va...@vthacker.in 
>>> <mailto:va...@vthacker.in>> a écrit :
>>> Hi Adrien,
>>> 
>>> I'd like to commit SOLR-11590 . The issue had a patch couple of weeks ago 
>>> and has been reviewed but never got committed. I've run all the tests twice 
>>> as well to verify.
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Andrzej Białecki 
>>> <andrzej.biale...@lucidworks.com <mailto:andrzej.biale...@lucidworks.com>> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 5 Dec 2017, at 18:05, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com 
>>>> <mailto:jpou...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Andrzej, ok to merge since it is a bug fix. Since we're close to the RC 
>>>> build, maybe try to get someone familiar with the code to review it to 
>>>> make sure it doesn't have unexpected side-effects?
>>> 
>>> Sure I’ll do this - thanks!
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Le mar. 5 déc. 2017 à 17:57, Andrzej Białecki 
>>>> <andrzej.biale...@lucidworks.com <mailto:andrzej.biale...@lucidworks.com>> 
>>>> a écrit :
>>>> Adrien,
>>>> 
>>>> If it’s ok I would also like to merge SOLR-11458, this significantly 
>>>> reduces the chance of accidental data loss when using MoveReplicaCmd.
>>>> 
>>>>> On 5 Dec 2017, at 14:44, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com 
>>>>> <mailto:jpou...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Quick update:
>>>>> 
>>>>> LUCENE-8043, SOLR-9137, SOLR-11662 and SOLR-11687 have been merged, they 
>>>>> will be in 7.2.
>>>>> 
>>>>> LUCENE-8048 and SOLR-11624 are still open. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> LUCENE-8048 looks like it could make things better in some cases but I 
>>>>> don't think it is required for 7.2, so I don't plan to hold the release 
>>>>> on it.
>>>>> 
>>>>> SOLR-11624 looks bad, I'll wait for it.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Le mar. 5 déc. 2017 à 07:45, Noble Paul <noble.p...@gmail.com 
>>>>> <mailto:noble.p...@gmail.com>> a écrit :
>>>>> +1 this is over due
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Dec 4, 2017 16:38, "Varun Thacker" <va...@vthacker.in 
>>>>> <mailto:va...@vthacker.in>> wrote:
>>>>> +1 Adrien ! Thanks for taking it up
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ QUEEN 
>>>>> VIC) <cpoersc...@bloomberg.net <mailto:cpoersc...@bloomberg.net>> wrote:
>>>>> I'd like to see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9137 
>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9137> included in the 
>>>>> release. Hoping to commit it on/by Tuesday.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Christine
>>>>> 
>>>>> From: dev@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev@lucene.apache.org> At: 12/01/17 
>>>>> 10:11:59
>>>>> To:  dev@lucene.apache.org <mailto:dev@lucene.apache.org>
>>>>> Subject: Lucene/Solr 7.2
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>> 
>>>>> It's been more than 6 weeks since we released 7.1 and we accumulated a 
>>>>> good set of changes, so I think we should release Lucene/Solr 7.2.0.
>>>>> 
>>>>> There is one change that I would like to have before building a RC: 
>>>>> LUCENE-8043[1], which looks like it is almost ready to be merged. Please 
>>>>> let me know if there are any other changes that should make it to the 
>>>>> release.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I volunteer to be the release manager. I'm currently thinking of building 
>>>>> the first release candidate next wednesday, December 6th.
>>>>> 
>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8043 
>>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8043>
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to