This particular committer's meeting has a particular subject/theme.  So as
Erick indicated, while all committers are invited, I think if you're not
interested in the subject then I'm sure you can find a better use of your
time.  The "Solr Implementation Proposal" could fit in I suppose, but not
Gradle (sorry Erick).

Lets have another committer meeting in the near future too to discuss
whatever Gradle and whatever.  I look forward to having more opportunities
to collaborate with more direct synchronous conversation.

~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley


On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 8:29 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya <
ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Jan, I think that is something that merits its own mail thread or jira for
> broader community participation.
>
> On Mon, 18 Nov, 2019, 5:19 AM Jan Høydahl, <jan....@cominvent.com> wrote:
>
>> I added this bullet point under "Community":
>>
>>
>>    - Should we adopt a formal decision process for proposing major
>>    changes/APIs to Solr, aka "Solr Implementation Proposal (SIP)"?
>>       - See proposal from Jörn Franke in dev@
>>       
>> <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/335f7cf581d799e64969821f3e3febf571edc60f07aa02c1193a81ca@%3Cdev.lucene.apache.org%3E>
>>  referring
>>       to KIP
>>       
>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Kafka+Improvement+Proposals>
>>        and FLIP
>>       
>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Flink+Improvement+Proposals>
>>
>>
>> Example: With SIP we would probably not have ended up with three
>> overlapping facet/stats implementations without a migration plan :)
>>
>> --
>> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
>> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
>>
>> 17. nov. 2019 kl. 15:13 skrev David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> The meeting will be held on Wednesday at 11am PST (2pm EST).  I'll send a
>> calendar invite tomorrow to those that used the Doodle poll.
>> The agenda is here:
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/2019-11+Meeting+on+SolrCloud+and+project+health
>>   Edit it if you wish.  If you can't (e.g. you are not a committer), then
>> maybe reply here to offer a suggestion.
>>
>> ~ David Smiley
>> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 1:56 PM David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I am proposing a virtual "Solr committer meeting" next week to discuss
>>> the concerns and ideas Mark Miller has raised recently.  The scope of
>>> conversation of this one is not the other wonderful things people are
>>> working on (e.g. new plugins architecture), though I would *love* to have
>>> future virtual committer meetings that are open-ended to discuss all manner
>>> of things on our minds.
>>>
>>> Why?  (A) I felt the committer meeting at Activate this year was
>>> fantastically productive (B) I love opportunities to see/hear from my
>>> awesome virtual colleagues (C) Mark raised issues of grave concern to our
>>> community
>>>
>>> When exactly is this?:  I'm using a "Doodle poll" to determine an
>>> optimal time slot.  For the link to the poll, go to the ASF Slack,
>>> #solr-dev channel, and you will see it.  You could also email me directly
>>> for it.
>>>
>>> For this virtual committer meeting and future ones:
>>> * This is in the spirit of committer meetings co-located with
>>> conferences.  I recall that ASF policy says that no "decisions" can be made
>>> in such a venue.  We make decisions on this dev list and indirectly via
>>> JIRA out in the open and with the opportunity for anyone to comment.
>>> * Who:  Committer-only or by invitation
>>> * Video chat with option of audio dial-in.  This time I will use Google
>>> Hangout.
>>> * Recorded for those invited only.  I'll dispose of the recording a week
>>> after.  The intention is for those who cannot be there due to a scheduling
>>> conflict to see/hear what was said.  I have the ability to do this
>>> recording via Salesforce's G-Suite subscription.
>>> * Published notes:  I (or someone) will take written meeting notes that
>>> are ultimately published for anyone to see (not restricted to those
>>> invited).  They will be transmitted to the dev list.
>>>
>>> Thanks everyone.  I hope we do more of these!  And I hope non-committers
>>> don't feel slighted; the published notes is a great time to make your voice
>>> heard here!  I'm open to suggestions.
>>>
>>> ~ David Smiley
>>> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
>>>
>>
>>

Reply via email to