I view Jörn’s SIP proposal as a way for tighter gate keeping of future major changes, helping maintain hard fought stability and speed.
Jan Høydahl > 18. nov. 2019 kl. 06:26 skrev David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com>: > > > This particular committer's meeting has a particular subject/theme. So as > Erick indicated, while all committers are invited, I think if you're not > interested in the subject then I'm sure you can find a better use of your > time. The "Solr Implementation Proposal" could fit in I suppose, but not > Gradle (sorry Erick). > > Lets have another committer meeting in the near future too to discuss > whatever Gradle and whatever. I look forward to having more opportunities to > collaborate with more direct synchronous conversation. > > ~ David Smiley > Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer > http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley > > >> On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 8:29 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya >> <ichattopadhy...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Jan, I think that is something that merits its own mail thread or jira for >> broader community participation. >> >>> On Mon, 18 Nov, 2019, 5:19 AM Jan Høydahl, <jan....@cominvent.com> wrote: >>> I added this bullet point under "Community": >>> >>> Should we adopt a formal decision process for proposing major changes/APIs >>> to Solr, aka "Solr Implementation Proposal (SIP)"? >>> See proposal from Jörn Franke in dev@ referring to KIP and FLIP >>> >>> Example: With SIP we would probably not have ended up with three >>> overlapping facet/stats implementations without a migration plan :) >>> >>> -- >>> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect >>> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com >>> >>>> 17. nov. 2019 kl. 15:13 skrev David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com>: >>>> >>>> The meeting will be held on Wednesday at 11am PST (2pm EST). I'll send a >>>> calendar invite tomorrow to those that used the Doodle poll. >>>> The agenda is here: >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/2019-11+Meeting+on+SolrCloud+and+project+health >>>> Edit it if you wish. If you can't (e.g. you are not a committer), then >>>> maybe reply here to offer a suggestion. >>>> >>>> ~ David Smiley >>>> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer >>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 1:56 PM David Smiley <david.w.smi...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> I am proposing a virtual "Solr committer meeting" next week to discuss >>>>> the concerns and ideas Mark Miller has raised recently. The scope of >>>>> conversation of this one is not the other wonderful things people are >>>>> working on (e.g. new plugins architecture), though I would *love* to have >>>>> future virtual committer meetings that are open-ended to discuss all >>>>> manner of things on our minds. >>>>> >>>>> Why? (A) I felt the committer meeting at Activate this year was >>>>> fantastically productive (B) I love opportunities to see/hear from my >>>>> awesome virtual colleagues (C) Mark raised issues of grave concern to our >>>>> community >>>>> >>>>> When exactly is this?: I'm using a "Doodle poll" to determine an optimal >>>>> time slot. For the link to the poll, go to the ASF Slack, #solr-dev >>>>> channel, and you will see it. You could also email me directly for it. >>>>> >>>>> For this virtual committer meeting and future ones: >>>>> * This is in the spirit of committer meetings co-located with >>>>> conferences. I recall that ASF policy says that no "decisions" can be >>>>> made in such a venue. We make decisions on this dev list and indirectly >>>>> via JIRA out in the open and with the opportunity for anyone to comment. >>>>> * Who: Committer-only or by invitation >>>>> * Video chat with option of audio dial-in. This time I will use Google >>>>> Hangout. >>>>> * Recorded for those invited only. I'll dispose of the recording a week >>>>> after. The intention is for those who cannot be there due to a >>>>> scheduling conflict to see/hear what was said. I have the ability to do >>>>> this recording via Salesforce's G-Suite subscription. >>>>> * Published notes: I (or someone) will take written meeting notes that >>>>> are ultimately published for anyone to see (not restricted to those >>>>> invited). They will be transmitted to the dev list. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks everyone. I hope we do more of these! And I hope non-committers >>>>> don't feel slighted; the published notes is a great time to make your >>>>> voice heard here! I'm open to suggestions. >>>>> >>>>> ~ David Smiley >>>>> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer >>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley >>>
