No problem in deferring the Gradle discussion. I’m getting into it a little deeper so I’ll know more about how close it is to prime-time as time passes..
> On Nov 18, 2019, at 11:04 AM, Mike Drob <[email protected]> wrote: > > What's the medium for this? Is somebody going to make a > webex/zoom/meet/whatever link? I'd like to make sure I have the right tools > installed and will do my best to join from airport wifi. > > On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 2:49 AM Jan Høydahl <[email protected]> wrote: > I view Jörn’s SIP proposal as a way for tighter gate keeping of future major > changes, helping maintain hard fought stability and speed. > > Jan Høydahl > >> 18. nov. 2019 kl. 06:26 skrev David Smiley <[email protected]>: >> >> >> This particular committer's meeting has a particular subject/theme. So as >> Erick indicated, while all committers are invited, I think if you're not >> interested in the subject then I'm sure you can find a better use of your >> time. The "Solr Implementation Proposal" could fit in I suppose, but not >> Gradle (sorry Erick). >> >> Lets have another committer meeting in the near future too to discuss >> whatever Gradle and whatever. I look forward to having more opportunities >> to collaborate with more direct synchronous conversation. >> >> ~ David Smiley >> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer >> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley >> >> >> On Sun, Nov 17, 2019 at 8:29 PM Ishan Chattopadhyaya >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> Jan, I think that is something that merits its own mail thread or jira for >> broader community participation. >> >> On Mon, 18 Nov, 2019, 5:19 AM Jan Høydahl, <[email protected]> wrote: >> I added this bullet point under "Community": >> >> • Should we adopt a formal decision process for proposing major >> changes/APIs to Solr, aka "Solr Implementation Proposal (SIP)"? >> • See proposal from Jörn Franke in dev@ referring to KIP and >> FLIP >> >> Example: With SIP we would probably not have ended up with three overlapping >> facet/stats implementations without a migration plan :) >> >> -- >> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect >> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com >> >>> 17. nov. 2019 kl. 15:13 skrev David Smiley <[email protected]>: >>> >>> The meeting will be held on Wednesday at 11am PST (2pm EST). I'll send a >>> calendar invite tomorrow to those that used the Doodle poll. >>> The agenda is here: >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SOLR/2019-11+Meeting+on+SolrCloud+and+project+health >>> Edit it if you wish. If you can't (e.g. you are not a committer), then >>> maybe reply here to offer a suggestion. >>> >>> ~ David Smiley >>> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer >>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 1:56 PM David Smiley <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> I am proposing a virtual "Solr committer meeting" next week to discuss the >>> concerns and ideas Mark Miller has raised recently. The scope of >>> conversation of this one is not the other wonderful things people are >>> working on (e.g. new plugins architecture), though I would *love* to have >>> future virtual committer meetings that are open-ended to discuss all manner >>> of things on our minds. >>> >>> Why? (A) I felt the committer meeting at Activate this year was >>> fantastically productive (B) I love opportunities to see/hear from my >>> awesome virtual colleagues (C) Mark raised issues of grave concern to our >>> community >>> >>> When exactly is this?: I'm using a "Doodle poll" to determine an optimal >>> time slot. For the link to the poll, go to the ASF Slack, #solr-dev >>> channel, and you will see it. You could also email me directly for it. >>> >>> For this virtual committer meeting and future ones: >>> * This is in the spirit of committer meetings co-located with conferences. >>> I recall that ASF policy says that no "decisions" can be made in such a >>> venue. We make decisions on this dev list and indirectly via JIRA out in >>> the open and with the opportunity for anyone to comment. >>> * Who: Committer-only or by invitation >>> * Video chat with option of audio dial-in. This time I will use Google >>> Hangout. >>> * Recorded for those invited only. I'll dispose of the recording a week >>> after. The intention is for those who cannot be there due to a scheduling >>> conflict to see/hear what was said. I have the ability to do this >>> recording via Salesforce's G-Suite subscription. >>> * Published notes: I (or someone) will take written meeting notes that are >>> ultimately published for anyone to see (not restricted to those invited). >>> They will be transmitted to the dev list. >>> >>> Thanks everyone. I hope we do more of these! And I hope non-committers >>> don't feel slighted; the published notes is a great time to make your voice >>> heard here! I'm open to suggestions. >>> >>> ~ David Smiley >>> Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer >>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
