I've never seen anything like this with any modern version of git. We use it at work, we have many branches.
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com> wrote: > My final biggest complaint with git is the bugginess of 'git status'. After > operations like merging (which can get complex), it will lie to you and tell > you your checkout is clean, when in fact its not: if you then type git push > it will push lots of commits. This is a real problem if you work on many > repositories, it means you must fall back to using patches and such > anyway... Aka... Git does not really work > > On Jan 2, 2014 3:52 PM, "Mark Miller" <markrmil...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> bzr is dying; Emacs needs to move >> >> >> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2014-01/msg00005.html >> >> Interesting thread. >> >> For similar reasons, I think that Lucene and Solr should eventually move >> to Git. It's not GitHub, but it's a lot closer. The new Apache projects I >> see are all choosing Git. It's the winners road I think. I don't know that >> there is a big hurry right now, but I think it's inevitable that we should >> switch. >> >> -- >> - Mark --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
