On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 7:22 PM, Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com> wrote: > is 1.7.10.2 considered old? It still happens to me with that. I use > git at work every day.
i honestly wouldn't have called that ancient, but I can't recall when I used a version before 1.8. i have no quick answer to the phenomenon that afflicts you. Feel free to ping me off-list on the off chance that I can think of something useful by asking you 20 questions that the rest of this list doesn't want to read. > > I think there are two reasons why i see this: > 1) I always like to run 'svn status' (actually followed by svn diff, > too), before committing as a final review to make sure i'm changing > what i'm thinking i'm changing. I must be able to do this with git > too. > > 2) After a merge, I like to run tests to ensure I won't actually break > things. I do this with svn too (e.g. run all tests after merge > --reintegrate). Tests can take some time. The phone might ring, i > might have to walk the dog, i might go get a beer. When i come back, > god forbid I run step 1 again to see what my current state is, or > re-run tests too. > > > On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> I've never seen anything like this with any modern version of git. We >> use it at work, we have many branches. >> >> On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> My final biggest complaint with git is the bugginess of 'git status'. After >>> operations like merging (which can get complex), it will lie to you and tell >>> you your checkout is clean, when in fact its not: if you then type git push >>> it will push lots of commits. This is a real problem if you work on many >>> repositories, it means you must fall back to using patches and such >>> anyway... Aka... Git does not really work >>> >>> On Jan 2, 2014 3:52 PM, "Mark Miller" <markrmil...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> bzr is dying; Emacs needs to move >>>> >>>> >>>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2014-01/msg00005.html >>>> >>>> Interesting thread. >>>> >>>> For similar reasons, I think that Lucene and Solr should eventually move >>>> to Git. It's not GitHub, but it's a lot closer. The new Apache projects I >>>> see are all choosing Git. It's the winners road I think. I don't know that >>>> there is a big hurry right now, but I think it's inevitable that we should >>>> switch. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> - Mark >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org