Cristian Driga wrote:
It took me 2-3 months before I understood how things work when I joined
and then I started participating. And it passed another 2-3 months
before what I did started to show results. As nobody here is full time
employee you should expect lack of response even to good ideas and you
should continue untill they get roots and flourish. This is something
you seem not to understand in an open source project.
I want to be a bit careful here. I don't want to support Steven's
approach, because I think it was too aggressive to be helpful. But
regardless of who's right and who'se wrong, I'd like to make a small
comment about this paragraph:
4-6 months seems like an awfully long lead time. Open source is supposed
to evolve quickly because it doesn't have the restraints that a
Cathedral has. Other open source projects don't have a 4-6 month wait
between first appearance and first contribution. In other projects I've
seen, it's been more like 1-2 weeks.
I do not get it. The last two or three weeks since we've started the
wiki in an attempt to solve the lack of interactive tools problem, the
project is in changing.
Cristian, I think you've done a fantastic work with the wiki and moving
the project forward.
Best,
Daniel.
--
/\/`) http://opendocumentfellowship.org
/\/_/
/\/_/ I'm not saying there should be a capital punishment for
\/_/ stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels
/ off of everything and let the problem solve itslef?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
