On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> wrote:

> 2012/12/3 Marc Pasteur <marc.past...@gmail.com>:
> > hi,
> >
> >
> > For the record according to log4j2 docs [1] you need some additional
> > library to make this works on Windows.
> > So if you don't want to display some ←[37m[ stuffs in the console
> jansi.jar
> > mut be put on maven/lib/ext folder
> >
> > Can it be "by default" ?
>
> for sure it's (at least in dynamic-logging-impl branch)
> Test that http://people.apache.org/~olamy/maven/dynamic-logging-impl/.
> Let us know if that work on Windows.
> Happy to give you some colors in your terminal life ! ("la vie en
> rose" maybe :-) )
> BTW does it works too when running maven in various IDE ? (sorry I'm
> an eternal terminal console lover).
>

I'm pretty sure it will not work in Eclipse because the Eclipse "console"
is not a real console. At least it did not work for me when I was working
on the color log features for log4j2. Works great in a real console of
course.

Gary

>
>
> >
> >
> > [1] http://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/layouts.html
> >
> > regards,
> >
> >
> > 2012/12/2 Arnaud Héritier <aherit...@gmail.com>
> >
> >> +1
> >> I don't think we'll have another minor release before the end of the
> year.
> >> For sure it won't be included in a bug fix release.
> >> We already release a minor release without (or so few) end-user value,
> we
> >> won't start to add new feature in a bug fix release :-)
> >>
> >> Arnaud
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com
> >> >wrote:
> >>
> >> > OK, 3.1.1 or 3.1-m2 or whatever before Christmas. Let's get this fish
> >> > out of the store and move on to the next one.
> >> >
> >> > On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > > Oh do please give us a color console for Christmas :)
> >> > >
> >> > > Gary
> >> > >
> >> > > On Dec 1, 2012, at 12:47, Jason van Zyl <ja...@tesla.io> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >> I already have started a logback version, but I don't think this
> >> should
> >> > affect rolling the 3.1.0.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> On Dec 1, 2012, at 6:57 AM, Arnaud Héritier <aherit...@gmail.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > >>
> >> > >>> I pushed the prototype developed by olivier using log4j2 in the
> >> > >>> branch feature/colorized-console/log4j2
> >> > >>> I updated with latest master changes
> >> > >>> You can test the distro of this code : http://cl.ly/1B1z051O0T10
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> Tonight I'll try to do a logback version
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> cheers
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> Arnaud
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Arnaud Héritier <
> >> aherit...@gmail.com
> >> > >wrote:
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Hervé BOUTEMY <
> >> herve.bout...@free.fr
> >> > >wrote:
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>>> I just created and fixed MNG-5395 and MNG-5396, which are logger
> >> > names
> >> > >>>>> enhancements from the actual values that will give value even
> with
> >> > slf4j-
> >> > >>>>> simple
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>> These should be a starting point for more global discussion
> about
> >> our
> >> > >>>>> logging
> >> > >>>>> conventions then fixed in our global codebase, since IMHO, these
> >> > issues
> >> > >>>>> show
> >> > >>>>> how we didn't use the logger names until now then we have a lot
> of
> >> > place
> >> > >>>>> where
> >> > >>>>> our logging pratice is not good
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>> Of course, I'm interested in colorized output, but since it has
> >> > impact on
> >> > >>>>> logging implementation choice, which will require a strong
> >> > discussion,
> >> > >>>>> this
> >> > >>>>> can't be done for the moment :|
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> A strong discussion ? seriously ?
> >> > >>>> We have 3 choices from my point of view :
> >> > >>>> * We do nothing, we keep the slf4j-simple
> >> > >>>> * We choose logback which is mature and used by a lot of people.
> >> > Nowadays
> >> > >>>> from my point of view it is the reference implementation
> >> > >>>> * We choose log4j2 which is really promising but always in beta.
> But
> >> > we
> >> > >>>> may do this "political" to support this project which is rising
> from
> >> > the
> >> > >>>> ashes (http://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/index.html)
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> In any case doing a choice nowadays for 3.1.0 won't prevent us to
> >> > change
> >> > >>>> it in the future. I really hope that the ability to switch from a
> >> > logger
> >> > >>>> implementation to another won't require several days of
> developments
> >> > or I
> >> > >>>> really missed something about it.
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> Cheers
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> Arnaud
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>> Regards,
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>> Hervé
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>> Le samedi 1 décembre 2012 09:17:52 Arnaud Héritier a écrit :
> >> > >>>>>> Hi Jason,
> >> > >>>>>>
> >> > >>>>>> Couldn't we have a look at olamy's log4j2 branch to see if we
> >> could
> >> > >>>>>> sanitize / merge it to propose at least one change for the end
> >> user
> >> > >>>>>> and demonstrate the interest of the change about logs : a
> >> colorized
> >> > >>>>>> console.
> >> > >>>>>>
> >> > >>>>>> I remember you did that in mvnsh/teslashell a long time ago
> (as an
> >> > >>>>>> extension ?) and perhaps it could be easy to add properly this
> >> > feature
> >> > >>>>>> in 3.1.0 (otherwise it won't be before a 3.2.0).
> >> > >>>>>>
> >> > >>>>>> Myself I'm using a 3.1.0 fork with this patch and I' m really
> >> > >>>>>> satisfied (it's so good to quickly see highlighted warning and
> >> > errors
> >> > >>>>>> ). I merged it back in the last 3.1.0 tag you did without issue
> >> > >>>>>>
> >> > >>>>>> Wdyt?
> >> > >>>>>>
> >> > >>>>>> ---------
> >> > >>>>>> Arnaud
> >> > >>>>>>
> >> > >>>>>> Le 1 déc. 2012 à 00:20, Jason van Zyl <ja...@tesla.io> a
> écrit :
> >> > >>>>>>> I'm done with the issues that cropped up so I'm ready to
> re-spin
> >> > >>>>> 3.1.0.
> >> > >>>>>>>
> >> > >>>>>>> Anyone want to add anything or discuss anything before I spin
> >> this?
> >> > >>>>> I'm
> >> > >>>>>>> not in any rush so if folks want to talk about logging we can.
> >> But
> >> > >>>>> given
> >> > >>>>>>> the fact once SLF4J initializes it can't change the
> >> implementation
> >> > >>>>>>> plugins integrating with Maven need to use the implementation
> we
> >> > >>>>> choose.
> >> > >>>>>>> This is how everything else in the world that integrates SLF4J
> >> has
> >> > to
> >> > >>>>>>> operate so I don't really see us being any different.
> >> > >>>>>>>
> >> > >>>>>>> I'll wait until tomorrow to re-spin.
> >> > >>>>>>>
> >> > >>>>>>> Thanks,
> >> > >>>>>>>
> >> > >>>>>>> Jason
> >> > >>>>>>>
> >> > >>>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------
> >> > >>>>>>> Jason van Zyl
> >> > >>>>>>> Founder & CTO, Sonatype
> >> > >>>>>>> Founder,  Apache Maven
> >> > >>>>>>> http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
> >> > >>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------
> >> > >>>>>>
> >> > >>>>>>
> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> >> > >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> >> > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>>
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>> --
> >> > >>>> -----
> >> > >>>> Arnaud Héritier
> >> > >>>> http://aheritier.net
> >> > >>>> Mail/GTalk: aheritier AT gmail DOT com
> >> > >>>> Twitter/Skype : aheritier
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>>
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>>
> >> > >>> --
> >> > >>> -----
> >> > >>> Arnaud Héritier
> >> > >>> http://aheritier.net
> >> > >>> Mail/GTalk: aheritier AT gmail DOT com
> >> > >>> Twitter/Skype : aheritier
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Thanks,
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Jason
> >> > >>
> >> > >> ----------------------------------------------------------
> >> > >> Jason van Zyl
> >> > >> Founder & CTO, Sonatype
> >> > >> Founder,  Apache Maven
> >> > >> http://twitter.com/jvanzyl
> >> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >>
> >> > >
> >> > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> -----
> >> Arnaud Héritier
> >> http://aheritier.net
> >> Mail/GTalk: aheritier AT gmail DOT com
> >> Twitter/Skype : aheritier
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> Olivier Lamy
> Talend: http://coders.talend.com
> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@maven.apache.org
>
>


-- 
E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: <http://goog_1249600977>http://bit.ly/ECvg0
Spring Batch in Action: <http://s.apache.org/HOq>http://bit.ly/bqpbCK
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory

Reply via email to